Comparison Overview

Trend Printing / International Label Inc.

VS

Signs Express Ltd

Trend Printing / International Label Inc.

undefined, Ridgefield, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

In 1959, Trend Printing was born. Our founder, Max started out with one machine and one customer. His mission was to provide high quality printing for a select clientele. That way of thinking seems to have been lost along the way by many printing companies, but not here at Trend. Now, over 55 years later, we still use that same philosophy, and believe that our customers are our greatest assets and each is important as the next. Our versatile equipment allows us to produce high quality labels and flexible packaging from the smallest quantities up into the millions, without skipping a beat. Come see why our customer driven philosophy has made Trend Printing / International Label successful for over 50 years! Visit us at www.trendlabel.org, or call us today at 201.941.6611

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Signs Express Ltd

Franchise Support Centre, Norwich, Norfolk, NR14 7PZ , GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Looking for bespoke and eye-catching signs and graphics? Then here at Signs Express we have the solutions for you. Established for over 30 years, we are dedicated to delivering our customers' innovative signs and graphics solutions. Known for exceptional service, our role is to work closely with you to bring your ideas to life. Signage comes in many forms and we have an extensive product range including interior and exterior signs, vehicle graphics, exhibition and display solutions and bespoke offerings. We have over 60 centres across the UK and Ireland and we are dedicated to supporting our local communities and businesses. To view our products and services and find your local centre head to our website

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 171
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trend-printing-international-label-inc..jpeg
Trend Printing / International Label Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signs-express-ltd.jpeg
Signs Express Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Trend Printing / International Label Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Signs Express Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trend Printing / International Label Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signs Express Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Trend Printing / International Label Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trend Printing / International Label Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Signs Express Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signs Express Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trend-printing-international-label-inc..jpeg
Trend Printing / International Label Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signs-express-ltd.jpeg
Signs Express Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Signs Express Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Signs Express Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company.

In the current year, Signs Express Ltd company and Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Signs Express Ltd company nor Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Signs Express Ltd company nor Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Signs Express Ltd company nor Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company nor Signs Express Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. nor Signs Express Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company nor Signs Express Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Signs Express Ltd company employs more people globally than Trend Printing / International Label Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. nor Signs Express Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. nor Signs Express Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. nor Signs Express Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. nor Signs Express Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. nor Signs Express Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Trend Printing / International Label Inc. nor Signs Express Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N