Comparison Overview

The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC

VS

Grondin Savarese Legal

The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC

1839 Iron Point Road, Suite 160, Folsom, CA, 95630, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The law firm of Travis G. Black & Associates represents seriously injured individuals who have been the victim of automobile accidents, slip and falls, bicycle accidents, tractor-trailer and motorcycle accidents and wrongful death accidents. Our firm defends individuals who have been arrested for DUI. Travis G. Black is a retired police officer who knows exactly what tactics and “tricks” the police often use in DUI cases. "I fought for victims rights when I was a police officer and I continue to do that now."​

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grondin Savarese Legal

555 boul. René-Lévesque O., Suite 550, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H2Z 1B1
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Lawyers Notre mission est d’aider nos clients à atteindre leurs buts et à réaliser leurs rêves, qu’ils soient personnels ou professionnels. Nous conseillons nos clients de façon à obtenir des résultats optimaux, en harmonie avec le système judiciaire canadien et québécois. Bien que ce système soit solide et que nous y croyons sincèrement, l’accès y est souvent coûteux. Nous en sommes conscients et faisons preuve de frugalité quand vient le temps d’aider des clients à trouver des solutions. Sachez que si vous avez une bonne cause, nous nous battrons sans relâche pour vous et pour la bonne administration de la justice. Nous serons honnêtes quant à vos chances de succès et prônerons souvent une résolution à l’amiable, surtout si nous pouvons vous épargner des frais. Nous sommes votre avocat.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travis-g-black-&-associates-inc-.jpeg
The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grondin Savarese Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grondin Savarese Legal in 2025.

Incident History — The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grondin Savarese Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grondin Savarese Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travis-g-black-&-associates-inc-.jpeg
The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grondin-savarese-legal.jpeg
Grondin Savarese Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company and Grondin Savarese Legal company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Grondin Savarese Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company.

In the current year, Grondin Savarese Legal company and The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grondin Savarese Legal company nor The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grondin Savarese Legal company nor The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grondin Savarese Legal company nor The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company nor Grondin Savarese Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC nor Grondin Savarese Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company nor Grondin Savarese Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grondin Savarese Legal company employs more people globally than The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC nor Grondin Savarese Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC nor Grondin Savarese Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC nor Grondin Savarese Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC nor Grondin Savarese Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC nor Grondin Savarese Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Law Office of Black & DePaoli, APC nor Grondin Savarese Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X