Comparison Overview

Travers Printing, Inc.

VS

JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics

Travers Printing, Inc.

PO BOX 279, Gardner, Massachusetts, 01440, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.traversprinting.com

Travers Printing is a Solutions Based Company (SBC). We have the right combination of people and technology to give you the competitive edge today's market demands. We do more than just excel at the craft of printing, we offer fulfillment services, project management, variable data printing, eCommerce solutions, and much more. Our mission is to provide our customers with quality printing, on time, with customized services tailored to your needs. We use advanced technologies, to prepare, print, bind, personalize and ship your jobs quickly, efficiently and cost effectively. Quality, timeliness and service are the key attributes that have contributed to our continued growth and prosperity for 125 years.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics

7840 West Hicks Street, Milwaukee, WI, 53219, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://johnroberts.com/JRDimensional

JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics, is the nation’s leading source for creatively engineered and produced dimensional items. Any structural product that can be mailed, serve as packaging for a product, a free-standing display, or as a three-dimensional promotional vehicle which can be kitted with samples, products, or other promotional items is where they excel. In addition, and new to commercial printing, is combining the power of technology to print, such as audio, video, motion, augmented reality, and other special effects.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travers-printing-inc..jpeg
Travers Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hm-graphics.jpeg
JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Travers Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travers Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Travers Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travers Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travers-printing-inc..jpeg
Travers Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hm-graphics.jpeg
JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Travers Printing, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Travers Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company and Travers Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. company nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. company nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics company employs more people globally than Travers Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor JR Dimensional, formerly HM Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References