Comparison Overview

Travers Printing, Inc.

VS

DIGITAL FRINGE

Travers Printing, Inc.

PO BOX 279, Gardner, Massachusetts, 01440, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.traversprinting.com

Travers Printing is a Solutions Based Company (SBC). We have the right combination of people and technology to give you the competitive edge today's market demands. We do more than just excel at the craft of printing, we offer fulfillment services, project management, variable data printing, eCommerce solutions, and much more. Our mission is to provide our customers with quality printing, on time, with customized services tailored to your needs. We use advanced technologies, to prepare, print, bind, personalize and ship your jobs quickly, efficiently and cost effectively. Quality, timeliness and service are the key attributes that have contributed to our continued growth and prosperity for 125 years.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DIGITAL FRINGE

1000 E 2nd St STE 1040, Dayton, Ohio, 45402-1536, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thedigitalfringe.com

DIGITAL FRINGE can rapidly transform your marketing and design ideas into gorgeous, photo-quality large format graphics. We specialize in Large Format Printing, Laminating and Mounting. Products include: Photo Prints, Posters, Vinyl Banners - indoor/outdoor, Fabric Banners, Canvas prints, Contour Cut Stickers, Trade Show Graphics, Floor Graphics, Wall Graphics, Yard Signs. The combination of various media, laminates and substrates gives us the ability to meet needs that are either common or specialized. Our staff welcomes the opportunity to take a consultative approach to determining the best method for your application. And, we have plenty of capacity! So, even if you are running behind on a project, give us a chance to show how we can help you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travers-printing-inc..jpeg
Travers Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalfringe.jpeg
DIGITAL FRINGE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Travers Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DIGITAL FRINGE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travers Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DIGITAL FRINGE in 2025.

Incident History — Travers Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travers Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DIGITAL FRINGE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DIGITAL FRINGE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/travers-printing-inc..jpeg
Travers Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalfringe.jpeg
DIGITAL FRINGE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Travers Printing, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DIGITAL FRINGE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DIGITAL FRINGE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Travers Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, DIGITAL FRINGE company and Travers Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DIGITAL FRINGE company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DIGITAL FRINGE company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DIGITAL FRINGE company nor Travers Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. company nor DIGITAL FRINGE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor DIGITAL FRINGE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. company nor DIGITAL FRINGE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DIGITAL FRINGE company employs more people globally than Travers Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor DIGITAL FRINGE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor DIGITAL FRINGE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor DIGITAL FRINGE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor DIGITAL FRINGE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor DIGITAL FRINGE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Travers Printing, Inc. nor DIGITAL FRINGE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References