Comparison Overview

Transport Heritage NSW

VS

The National Gallery

Transport Heritage NSW

500 Harris St, Ultimo, New South Wales, AU, 2005
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thnsw.com.au

Transport Heritage NSW (THNSW) is a not-for-profit, member-based organisation operating under four primary pillars: Museums - Operation of two public rail heritage attractions in NSW - NSW Rail Museum and Valley Heights Locomotive Depot Heritage Museum Heritage Events & Experiences - Operation of heritage train experiences at the NSW Rail Museum and throughout NSW - Delivering major events, activities and education programs at the NSW Rail Museum and throughout NSW Sector Development - Providing a leadership role and delivering a range of support activities to the transport heritage sector on behalf of the NSW Government Heritage & Collection Management - Managing a portfolio of primarily rail heritage assets owned by the NSW Government on behalf of Transport for NSW

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The National Gallery

London , GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk

The National Gallery houses the national collection of paintings in the Western European tradition from the 13th to the 19th centuries. It is on show 361 days a year, free of charge. The Gallery's aim is to care for, enhance and study its collection, so as to be able to encourage access to the pictures for the education and enjoyment of the widest possible public now and in the future. It aims for the highest international standards in all its activities.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 563
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-heritage-nsw.jpeg
Transport Heritage NSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-national-gallery.jpeg
The National Gallery
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Transport Heritage NSW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The National Gallery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport Heritage NSW in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The National Gallery in 2026.

Incident History — Transport Heritage NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport Heritage NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The National Gallery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The National Gallery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-heritage-nsw.jpeg
Transport Heritage NSW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-national-gallery.jpeg
The National Gallery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The National Gallery company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transport Heritage NSW company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The National Gallery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Transport Heritage NSW company.

In the current year, The National Gallery company and Transport Heritage NSW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The National Gallery company nor Transport Heritage NSW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The National Gallery company nor Transport Heritage NSW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The National Gallery company nor Transport Heritage NSW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW company nor The National Gallery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW nor The National Gallery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW company nor The National Gallery company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The National Gallery company employs more people globally than Transport Heritage NSW company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW nor The National Gallery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW nor The National Gallery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW nor The National Gallery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW nor The National Gallery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW nor The National Gallery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW nor The National Gallery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References