Comparison Overview

Transport for London

VS

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)

Transport for London

5 Endeavour Square, Westfield Avenue,, London , GB, E20 1JN
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 550 and 599

Every day, we help millions of people to make journeys across London: By Tube, bus, tram, car, bike – and more. People don’t associate us with journeys by river, on foot or via the air, but we help with that, too. Getting people to where they need to go has been our business for over 100 years, and it shows. We’re leaders in our field, and no other city’s transport system is quite as recognisable: Red buses, black taxis, Tube trains and roundels have become icons in their own right. Our main job is to keep the city moving, working and growing but to do that, we have to listen. Constant improvements across the network are fuelled by feedback and comments from customers, as well as work within communities, representative groups, businesses and other London transport stakeholders. But our progress also depends on technology and data. With the future at our fingertips, we’ve already used it to revolutionise travel payments (think Oyster and contactless payment cards), and improved travel information. Tech and data is essential, not just to our future, but to others’: third parties use our data to power apps and services vital to customer journeys. So what’s next? As well as continuing to deliver Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan’s strategy and commitments on transport, our programme of capital investments is still one of the largest. We launched the Elizabeth line, we’re modernising services and stations and making travel safer for all.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18,194
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)

Rte de Ferney 140, 1202 Genève, Geneva, GE, 1202, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is an international, independent, medical humanitarian organisation working to provide medical assistance to people affected by conflict, epidemics, disasters, or exclusion from healthcare. Since our founding in 1971, we’ve grown to a global movement delivering humanitarian assistance in over 70 countries. Thanks to our 7 million individual donors, our work remains impartial and independent. Read more about us on msf.org

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23,734
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m-decins-sans-fronti-res-msf-.jpeg
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Transport for London
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

Transport for London has 163.16% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in 2025.

Incident History — Transport for London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-for-london.jpeg
Transport for London
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized use of computer systems (TfL), Zero-Day Exploit in Oracle E-Business Suite Servers (Oracle)
Motivation: Unclear (potentially disruption or data theft for TfL), Financial gain / extortion (Oracle)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown (likely exploit of exchange vulnerabilities or credential compromise)
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m-decins-sans-fronti-res-msf-.jpeg
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transport for London company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transport for London company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Transport for London company has reported more cyber incidents than Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company.

Transport for London company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company nor Transport for London company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Transport for London company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transport for London company nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Transport for London nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Transport for London company.

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) company employs more people globally than Transport for London company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Transport for London nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Transport for London nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Transport for London nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Transport for London nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Transport for London nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Transport for London nor Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N