Comparison Overview

Transplant Alliance Foundation

VS

Tangible Hope Foundation

Transplant Alliance Foundation

799 State St, Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.transplantalliance.org

Transplant Alliance Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, with the mission to spread awareness about Organ Donation. Founded in 2007 by Mary Lovely, a two-time transplant recipient, in hopes of giving back to a community that she has come to love. Mary has the innate ability to connect with others and care for them on a deeper level than most. It’s through her connections within the community that she’s learned of the financial need many have. It is her hope to provide funding to people waiting for or are healing from their transplants.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tangible Hope Foundation

P.O. Box 2868, SAUSALITO, California, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799
http://tangiblehope.org

Tangible Hope Foundation is a fully licensed non-profit organization operating in the village of Koffele, Ethiopia and a 501 (c) 3 non-profit organization located in San Francisco, California which currently funds our efforts in Ethiopia. It is our intention to replicate our model and mission in areas of the world where girls and women are marginalized. Currently we have focused on empowering and protecting young girls living in poverty in rural Ethiopia by advancing their rights through education, medical care and nutrition. It is our goal that this generation of women, in the world, will inspire and lead those around them and the next generation out of poverty and into a world of opportunity.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transplant-alliance-foundation.jpeg
Transplant Alliance Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tangible-hope-foundation.jpeg
Tangible Hope Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Transplant Alliance Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tangible Hope Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transplant Alliance Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tangible Hope Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Transplant Alliance Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transplant Alliance Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tangible Hope Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tangible Hope Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transplant-alliance-foundation.jpeg
Transplant Alliance Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tangible-hope-foundation.jpeg
Tangible Hope Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Transplant Alliance Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tangible Hope Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tangible Hope Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Transplant Alliance Foundation company.

In the current year, Tangible Hope Foundation company and Transplant Alliance Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tangible Hope Foundation company nor Transplant Alliance Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tangible Hope Foundation company nor Transplant Alliance Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tangible Hope Foundation company nor Transplant Alliance Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation company nor Tangible Hope Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation nor Tangible Hope Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation company nor Tangible Hope Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Transplant Alliance Foundation company employs more people globally than Tangible Hope Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation nor Tangible Hope Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation nor Tangible Hope Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation nor Tangible Hope Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation nor Tangible Hope Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation nor Tangible Hope Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Transplant Alliance Foundation nor Tangible Hope Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References