Comparison Overview

Transparency International Georgia

VS

Valorēs

Transparency International Georgia

61, Agmashenebeli Ave, Tbilisi, GE, 0102
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749

Transparency International Georgia (TI Georgia) is a local non-governmental organization committed to combating corruption in Georgia through the promotion of transparency and accountability. Our mission is to serve as the primary source of information on corruption reform in Georgia, to assist the government and the broader public in facilitating reform in sectors where corruption exists, to build and strengthen institutions and to promote good governance. In recent years, TI Georgia has become Georgia's leading advocacy-based think tank. TI Georgia is a member of the Transparency International (TI) movement, the only global non-governmental organization devoted to combating corruption. It brings together civil society, business, and governments in a powerful global coalition. TI, through its International Secretariat and more than 90 independent national chapters around the world, works to stem both the supply and demand of corruption at the local, national, and international levels.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Valorēs

232B Avenue de l'Église, Shippagan, Nouveau-Brunswick, CA, E8S 1J2
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Valorēs - formerly IRZC - is composed of scientific professionals committed to the valorisation of resources in aquaculture, peatlands, soils, fishery and marine coproducts. ​ The research institute incorporated in 2002, has its’ main buildings located in Shippagan, New Brunswick from where it offers chemical and microbial analysis as well as support services in the field of sustainable development. ​ ​Valorēs also applies its know-how and experience from two other strategic locations: Caraquet and Charlo.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transparency-international-georgia.jpeg
Transparency International Georgia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valores.jpeg
Valorēs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Transparency International Georgia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Valorēs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transparency International Georgia in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valorēs in 2025.

Incident History — Transparency International Georgia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transparency International Georgia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Valorēs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valorēs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transparency-international-georgia.jpeg
Transparency International Georgia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valores.jpeg
Valorēs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Valorēs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transparency International Georgia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Valorēs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Transparency International Georgia company.

In the current year, Valorēs company and Transparency International Georgia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Valorēs company nor Transparency International Georgia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Valorēs company nor Transparency International Georgia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Valorēs company nor Transparency International Georgia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor Valorēs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Transparency International Georgia nor Valorēs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor Valorēs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Transparency International Georgia company and Valorēs company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Transparency International Georgia nor Valorēs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Transparency International Georgia nor Valorēs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Transparency International Georgia nor Valorēs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Transparency International Georgia nor Valorēs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Transparency International Georgia nor Valorēs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Transparency International Georgia nor Valorēs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X