Comparison Overview

Transnet SOC Ltd

VS

PSA International

Transnet SOC Ltd

138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2001
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark on the lives of all South Africans. With a geographical footprint that covers our entire country, Transnet is inextricably involved in all aspects of life in South Africa. Through the Transnet Foundation - which is the Corporate Social Investment arm of Transnet - we have invested time and money in several diverse programmes around the country that provide much-needed succour to our communities. Looking ahead, Transnet is focused on modernizing infrastructure, driving growth, and enhancing efficiency through strategic partnerships. Our vision is clear: to contribute meaningfully to South Africa’s economic aspirations through sustainable growth and modernization.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 26,735
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

PSA International

1 Harbour Drive, #03-00 PSA Horizons, Singapore, Singapore, SG, 117352
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

PSA International (PSA) is a leading global port operator and trusted partner to cargo stakeholders. Currently, PSA’s portfolio comprises over 70 deepsea, rail and inland terminals, across more than 180 locations in 45 countries – including two flagship port operations in Singapore and Belgium. Drawing on the deep expertise and experience from a diverse global team, PSA collaborates with its customers and partners to develop world-class port ecosystems and deliver innovative supply chain solutions to accelerate the shift towards sustainable trade. Visit us at www.globalpsa.com, or follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook (@globalpsa). Visit us at www.globalpsa.com. Our affiliated business units on Linkedin: @PSA Singapore @PSA Belgium @PSA BDP @PSA Euromed and Americas @PSA India @Saudi Global Ports Company @Exolgan Container Terminal @PSA Panama @Sociedad Puerto Industrial Aguadulce @Mersin International Port @PSA Italy @Baltic Hub @PSA Marine @PSA unboXed @CrimsonLogic @Global DTC (Digital Trade Corridor)

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 12,014
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-soc-ltd.jpeg
Transnet SOC Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalpsa.jpeg
PSA International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Transnet SOC Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PSA International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet SOC Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PSA International in 2025.

Incident History — Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PSA International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PSA International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-soc-ltd.jpeg
Transnet SOC Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globalpsa.jpeg
PSA International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Transnet SOC Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PSA International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transnet SOC Ltd company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PSA International company has not reported any.

In the current year, PSA International company and Transnet SOC Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Transnet SOC Ltd company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PSA International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PSA International company nor Transnet SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PSA International company nor Transnet SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd company nor PSA International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd nor PSA International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PSA International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Transnet SOC Ltd company.

Transnet SOC Ltd company employs more people globally than PSA International company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd nor PSA International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd nor PSA International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd nor PSA International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd nor PSA International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd nor PSA International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd nor PSA International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeaCMS up to 13.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file js/player/dmplayer/dmku/class/mysqli.class.php. Such manipulation of the argument page/limit leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Tormorten WP Microdata allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Microdata: from n/a through 1.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14(408). Affected is the function sprintf of the file /goform/SetIpBind. Such manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X