Comparison Overview

TransHire

VS

PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.

TransHire

None
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

TransHire is a privately held WMBE company; delivering best in class talent to over 300 clients. We bring 26 years of expertise in workforce management solutions. We specialize in the fields of administrative support; contact center support, accounting & finance professionals, IT professionals and light industrial staff.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.

2-1-1 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku
Last Update: 2025-06-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

PERSOL Holdings (re-branded from Temp Holdings) as Japan's largest temp staffing firm and world's 7th largest HR Agency, does management and planning of Group companies providing a wide range of human resource services such as general worker dispatching, permanent placement, outsourcing, etc. โ€œPERSOLโ€ is a word coined to express our aim to solve (SOLUTION) social problems through the growth of people (PERSON). โ€œPERSOLโ€ expresses our aspiration to support the growth of working people and create a bright future.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
TransHire
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/persol-holdings.jpeg
PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
TransHire
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TransHire in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History โ€” TransHire (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TransHire cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
TransHire
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/persol-holdings.jpeg
PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both TransHire company and PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TransHire company.

In the current year, PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company and TransHire company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company nor TransHire company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company nor TransHire company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company nor TransHire company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TransHire company nor PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TransHire company nor PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TransHire company employs more people globally than PERSOL Holdings Co., Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.