Comparison Overview

Trafford Publishing

VS

MIT Sloan Management Review

Trafford Publishing

1663 Liberty Drive, Bloomington, 47403, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

1995 marked a publishing industry revolution. Trafford defied popular belief by introducing “on-demand book publishing services.” This pioneering innovation marked the dawn of the Independent Book Publishing Industry. Fast forward fifteen years, and 2009’s Indie Published books significantly outnumbered works released by traditional publishing houses, accounting for more than 70% of the year’s 1 million plus titles. Trafford, Indie Publishing’s founding father, is proud to have been the spark that ignited a revolution giving voice to hundreds of thousands of authors. These very same authors would have been resigned to silence in the not too distant past. Trafford’s inspiration stems from a genuine belief in our authors. More than 10,000 writers from over 120 countries have realized their dream of publication with Trafford as their Indie Publishing Partner. Our goal is to provide the ultimate publishing experience producing the definitive book born of a vivid imagination. This authometric motivation means that we are continually evaluating, adapting and developing our services, fuelled by author feedback. Visit our website. Fill out the form and a publishing consultant will be in touch with you within 24 hours.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MIT Sloan Management Review

One Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

At MIT Sloan Management Review (MIT SMR), we explore how leadership and management are transforming in a disruptive world. We help thoughtful leaders capture the exciting opportunities—and face down the challenges—created as technological, societal, and environmental forces reshape how organizations operate, compete, and create value. We encourage comments, questions, and suggestions. We respect and appreciate our audience's point of view; however, we reserve the right to remove or turn off comments at our moderator’s discretion. Comments that violate our guidelines (see below) or use language that MIT SMR staff regard as abusive, attacking, offensive, vulgar, or of a bullying nature will be immediately removed. Repeat offenders may be blocked indefinitely. MIT Sloan Management Review’s LinkedIn Commenting Guidelines: 1. Respect. Debates are great, but attacks are not. Any comment that creates a hostile environment will be removed. 2. Hate speech. Comments containing bullying, racism, homophobia, sexism, or any other form of hate speech will be removed. 3. Language. Vulgar posts may offend other readers and will be removed. 4. Personal information. Any comment with personal information (address, phone number, etc.) will be removed.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trafford-publishing.jpeg
Trafford Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-sloan-management-review.jpeg
MIT Sloan Management Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Trafford Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MIT Sloan Management Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trafford Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Sloan Management Review in 2025.

Incident History — Trafford Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trafford Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MIT Sloan Management Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT Sloan Management Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trafford-publishing.jpeg
Trafford Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-sloan-management-review.jpeg
MIT Sloan Management Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Trafford Publishing company and MIT Sloan Management Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, MIT Sloan Management Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Trafford Publishing company.

In the current year, MIT Sloan Management Review company and Trafford Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MIT Sloan Management Review company nor Trafford Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MIT Sloan Management Review company nor Trafford Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MIT Sloan Management Review company nor Trafford Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Trafford Publishing company nor MIT Sloan Management Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Trafford Publishing nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MIT Sloan Management Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Trafford Publishing company.

Trafford Publishing company employs more people globally than MIT Sloan Management Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Trafford Publishing nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Trafford Publishing nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Trafford Publishing nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Trafford Publishing nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Trafford Publishing nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Trafford Publishing nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.