Comparison Overview

Traffic Ticket Advocates

VS

Costs Partners Pty Limited

Traffic Ticket Advocates

465 Davis Dr #113, Newmarket, ON, L3Y 2P1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Traffic Ticket Advocates 465 Davis Dr #113 Newmarket, ON L3Y 2P1 1 866-840-5401 http://www.trafficticketadvocates.ca/ Traffic Ticket Advocates can help you with your traffic tickets, accidents, speeding tickets and any moving traffic violation. We are conveniently located in Newmarket, in the same building as the York Region Traffic Court. We have been helping drivers in York Region since 1993 and every time we step into the courtroom we bring our years of experience and knowledge with us.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Costs Partners Pty Limited

201 Sussex Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Costs Partners are industry leaders in legal costs, bringing a new approach to your legal costs requirements We offer a comprehensive range of legal costs services including: - preparation of solicitor client/party party bills of costs, notices of objection, concession and responses - expert advice on assessment and costing issues Our director, Peta Solomon BA LLB, has more than 20 years legal costs experience across all jurisdictions and in all areas of costing. All our senior consultants are regular presenters at conferences and contributors to the leading journals on the subject each having in excess of 10 years experience in legal costs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trafficticketadvocates.jpeg
Traffic Ticket Advocates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/costs-partners-pty-limited.jpeg
Costs Partners Pty Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Traffic Ticket Advocates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Costs Partners Pty Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Traffic Ticket Advocates in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Costs Partners Pty Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Traffic Ticket Advocates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Traffic Ticket Advocates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Costs Partners Pty Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Costs Partners Pty Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trafficticketadvocates.jpeg
Traffic Ticket Advocates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/costs-partners-pty-limited.jpeg
Costs Partners Pty Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Traffic Ticket Advocates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Costs Partners Pty Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Costs Partners Pty Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Traffic Ticket Advocates company.

In the current year, Costs Partners Pty Limited company and Traffic Ticket Advocates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Costs Partners Pty Limited company nor Traffic Ticket Advocates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Costs Partners Pty Limited company nor Traffic Ticket Advocates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Costs Partners Pty Limited company nor Traffic Ticket Advocates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates company nor Costs Partners Pty Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Costs Partners Pty Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates company nor Costs Partners Pty Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Traffic Ticket Advocates company employs more people globally than Costs Partners Pty Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Costs Partners Pty Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Costs Partners Pty Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Costs Partners Pty Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Costs Partners Pty Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Costs Partners Pty Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Costs Partners Pty Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X