Comparison Overview

Traffic Ticket Advocates

VS

Barrett Reporting, Inc

Traffic Ticket Advocates

465 Davis Dr #113, Newmarket, ON, L3Y 2P1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Traffic Ticket Advocates 465 Davis Dr #113 Newmarket, ON L3Y 2P1 1 866-840-5401 http://www.trafficticketadvocates.ca/ Traffic Ticket Advocates can help you with your traffic tickets, accidents, speeding tickets and any moving traffic violation. We are conveniently located in Newmarket, in the same building as the York Region Traffic Court. We have been helping drivers in York Region since 1993 and every time we step into the courtroom we bring our years of experience and knowledge with us.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Barrett Reporting, Inc

1922 N Broadway, Santa Ana, California, 92706, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Barrett Reporting provides court reporters, videographers, interpreters and conference suites for depositions, court trials, hearings, meetings and conferences. We pride ourselves on customer service and responsiveness to our clients' needs at the most competitive rates. Barrett Reporting provides Complimentary Conference Suites wherever you need for as long as our reporter is utilized and we produce a minimum deposition transcript for you. Call us Toll Free at (888) 740-1100 to schedule today!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trafficticketadvocates.jpeg
Traffic Ticket Advocates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barrett-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Barrett Reporting, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Traffic Ticket Advocates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barrett Reporting, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Traffic Ticket Advocates in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barrett Reporting, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Traffic Ticket Advocates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Traffic Ticket Advocates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barrett Reporting, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barrett Reporting, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trafficticketadvocates.jpeg
Traffic Ticket Advocates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barrett-reporting-inc-.jpeg
Barrett Reporting, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Traffic Ticket Advocates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barrett Reporting, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Barrett Reporting, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Traffic Ticket Advocates company.

In the current year, Barrett Reporting, Inc company and Traffic Ticket Advocates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc company nor Traffic Ticket Advocates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc company nor Traffic Ticket Advocates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Barrett Reporting, Inc company nor Traffic Ticket Advocates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates company nor Barrett Reporting, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Barrett Reporting, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates company nor Barrett Reporting, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Barrett Reporting, Inc company employs more people globally than Traffic Ticket Advocates company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Barrett Reporting, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Barrett Reporting, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Barrett Reporting, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Barrett Reporting, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Barrett Reporting, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Traffic Ticket Advocates nor Barrett Reporting, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X