Comparison Overview

Trackelast

VS

VRS Railway Industry BV

Trackelast

None, None, Liskeard, Cornwall, None, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Since 1946 Trackelast has specialised in the design, development, testing and manufacture of resilient rail support materials and other components designed to reduce noise and vibration from rail track, whether that be for heavy or light rail applications. Trackelast offers specialist rail solutions by providing a full technical service, supported by our in-house R&D facilities, to assist in specifying and selecting materials for a wide variety of applications.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VRS Railway Industry BV

Vleugelboot 32a, Houten, undefined, undefined, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

VRS Railway Industry is een dochteronderneming van Vialis. Al meer dan 130 jaar zijn we specialist in de ontwikkeling van spoorwegbeveiligingssystemen. Onze expertise bestaat uit het ontwikkelen van producten en systemen voor railinfrastructuur, het assembleren en reviseren van deze producten en systemen, uitgebreid testen en het verlenen van services. Dat doen we met de beste mensen. Daarbij biedt onze unieke locatie in Houten de mogelijkheid om niet alleen alles te ontwerpen maar ook ter plaatse fysiek te construeren zodat we zelf uitvoerig kunnen testen. Daarom lopen we voorop: we investeren veel in Research & Development en zijn marktleider in Nederland. Wil je bij ons werken? Check dan onze vacatures! Innovatie Bij VRS Railway Industry blijven we continu innoveren. Veiligheid en betrouwbaarheid zijn immers cruciaal in de wereld van het spoor. Als het gaat om overweginstallaties, seinen en wisselstellers, zijn we technisch toonaangevend in Nederland en ver daarbuiten. Zo zijn bijvoorbeeld onze nieuwste generatie led-seinen beter zichtbaar onder alle omstandigheden en alle zichthoeken. Onze wisselstellers zijn pasgeleden aangepast voor nog betere prestaties onder winterse omstandigheden.. Verder ontwikkelen we momenteel een nieuwe overweginstallatie die voldoet aan de laatste internationale eisen. Deze is onder andere voorzien is van intelligente monitoring voor het melden van storingen en onderhoudsbehoefte; een ontwikkeling waarmee we een stap voorwaarts zetten in veiligheid en betrouwbaarheid.. Onze railspoel is aangepast voor de toepassing van aluminium bekabeling, waardoor de kans op koperdiefstal kan worden verkleind. Meer info over ons vind je op www.vrsrail.nl

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trackelast.jpeg
Trackelast
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vrs-railway-industry-bv.jpeg
VRS Railway Industry BV
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Trackelast
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VRS Railway Industry BV
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trackelast in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VRS Railway Industry BV in 2025.

Incident History — Trackelast (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trackelast cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VRS Railway Industry BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VRS Railway Industry BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trackelast.jpeg
Trackelast
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vrs-railway-industry-bv.jpeg
VRS Railway Industry BV
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Trackelast company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VRS Railway Industry BV company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, VRS Railway Industry BV company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Trackelast company.

In the current year, VRS Railway Industry BV company and Trackelast company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VRS Railway Industry BV company nor Trackelast company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VRS Railway Industry BV company nor Trackelast company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VRS Railway Industry BV company nor Trackelast company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Trackelast company nor VRS Railway Industry BV company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Trackelast nor VRS Railway Industry BV holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VRS Railway Industry BV company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Trackelast company.

Neither Trackelast nor VRS Railway Industry BV holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Trackelast nor VRS Railway Industry BV holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Trackelast nor VRS Railway Industry BV holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Trackelast nor VRS Railway Industry BV holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Trackelast nor VRS Railway Industry BV holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Trackelast nor VRS Railway Industry BV holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H