Comparison Overview

Trackelast

VS

Beena Vision Solutions

Trackelast

None, None, Liskeard, Cornwall, None, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Since 1946 Trackelast has specialised in the design, development, testing and manufacture of resilient rail support materials and other components designed to reduce noise and vibration from rail track, whether that be for heavy or light rail applications. Trackelast offers specialist rail solutions by providing a full technical service, supported by our in-house R&D facilities, to assist in specifying and selecting materials for a wide variety of applications.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Beena Vision Solutions

600 Pinnacle Ct, Norcross, 30071, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Wabtec is a leading global provider of equipment, systems, digital solutions, and value-added services. Whether it's freight rail, transit, mining, industrial, or marine, our expertise, technologies, and people - together - are accelerating the future of transportation. The Beena Vision range of vision-based wayside non-contact measurement and inspection technologies enable the automated, proactive monitoring of rolling stock condition, providing data feeds that can be processed to effectively assess rolling stock condition from component level to full train inspection. Using this comprehensive portfolio of on-board and wayside condition monitoring solutions, rail companies can improve operational efficiencies, increase safety, manage service levels and reduce costs. Customers using Beena Vision solutions include major freight operators such as BNSF, Aurizon, Norfolk Southern, Canadian National, and many passenger operators such as SNC and NS.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trackelast.jpeg
Trackelast
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beena-vision-systems-inc-.jpeg
Beena Vision Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Trackelast
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Beena Vision Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trackelast in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beena Vision Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Trackelast (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trackelast cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Beena Vision Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beena Vision Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trackelast.jpeg
Trackelast
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beena-vision-systems-inc-.jpeg
Beena Vision Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Trackelast company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Beena Vision Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Beena Vision Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Trackelast company.

In the current year, Beena Vision Solutions company and Trackelast company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Beena Vision Solutions company nor Trackelast company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Beena Vision Solutions company nor Trackelast company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Beena Vision Solutions company nor Trackelast company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Trackelast company nor Beena Vision Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Trackelast nor Beena Vision Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Trackelast company nor Beena Vision Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Trackelast nor Beena Vision Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Trackelast nor Beena Vision Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Trackelast nor Beena Vision Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Trackelast nor Beena Vision Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Trackelast nor Beena Vision Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Trackelast nor Beena Vision Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H