Comparison Overview

TPOP

VS

Vincent Direct

TPOP

Nîmes, 30000, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

TPOP is the leader of green Print on Demand. Thanks to an entirely automatized and easy-to- use platform, we offer the possibility to print your designs on a vast range of quality products, combining clothing, goodies and home decor. Our app is perfectly accessible to e-tailers; we offer integrations of your Shopify, Etsy and Woocommerce shops as well as an option for manual orders. We help brands, artists and entrepreneurs to develop their own apparel and goodies line without having to worry about the logistics and shipping aspects, which we take care of entirely, to let them devote themselves 100% to the designing and marketing facets of managing their business. One of the numerous advantages of the system we offer lies in the fact that there is no upfront investment needed: therefore, the risk-taking part commonly associated with the building of a business is largely minimized. We ship directly to your client on your behalf: our entirely transparent service has the main objective to honor your branding. Our users represent a very wide range of talents, visions and nationalities. Thanks to a renowned service guaranteeing reactivity, high quality and friendly communication, our relations with our T-Partners are based on loyalty and confidence. This last point is particularly highlighted by the important number of positive reviews we are used to receiving frequently. Our engagement for the preservation of the planet incarnates one of the biggest advantages of our enterprise. We handpick our products so that we can offer a catalogue of the highest-quality ethically and ecologically-manufactured products, made from recycled or organic materials. In a sector like Print on Demand, symbol of a need to consume more reasonably, it seemed important to us to do our utmost to offer a service as green as possible. Founded in 2015 in the South of France by two printing enthusiasts, TPOP is, on this day, in hypergrowth, while taking care of keeping its initial values.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Vincent Direct

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Vincent Direct is your single, reliable resource for the design, production, mailing, management and distribution of your marketing materials. We can provide you with all of your marketing materials from start to finish, under one roof. You can find out more about Vincent Direct by visiting our web site at www.vincentdirect.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpop.jpeg
TPOP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Vincent Direct
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TPOP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vincent Direct
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPOP in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vincent Direct in 2025.

Incident History — TPOP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPOP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vincent Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vincent Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpop.jpeg
TPOP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Vincent Direct
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Vincent Direct company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TPOP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vincent Direct company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TPOP company.

In the current year, Vincent Direct company and TPOP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vincent Direct company nor TPOP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vincent Direct company nor TPOP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vincent Direct company nor TPOP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TPOP company nor Vincent Direct company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TPOP nor Vincent Direct holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TPOP company nor Vincent Direct company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TPOP company employs more people globally than Vincent Direct company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither TPOP nor Vincent Direct holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TPOP nor Vincent Direct holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TPOP nor Vincent Direct holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TPOP nor Vincent Direct holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TPOP nor Vincent Direct holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TPOP nor Vincent Direct holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L