Comparison Overview

THE PLAN Journal

VS

Computerworld

THE PLAN Journal

Via del Pratello, 8, Bologna, 40122, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://theplanjournal.com/

THE PLAN Journal (TPJ) intends to disseminate and promote innovative, thought-provoking and relevant research, studies and criticism in architecture and urbanism. The criteria for selecting contributions will be innovation, clarity of purpose and method, and potential transformational impact on disciplinary fields or the broader socio-cultural context. The ultimate purpose of the TPJ is to enrich the dialog between research and professional fields, in order to encourage both applicable new knowledge and intellectually driven modes of practice. (Maurizio Sabini)

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Computerworld

New York City, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.computerworld.com

Computerworld from Foundry is recognized as the most trusted resource to Enterprise IT Leaders at all management levels seeking to align their business and technology goals. Computerworld leads with analysis of news, transformational technologies and trends, providing peer-based content with real-world strategies for implementing technology to drive business results. Only Computerworld’s unique audience delivers efficient coverage of all key stakeholders in the IT purchase process.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3,657
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpj.jpeg
THE PLAN Journal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computerworld.jpeg
Computerworld
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
THE PLAN Journal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Computerworld
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for THE PLAN Journal in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computerworld in 2025.

Incident History — THE PLAN Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

THE PLAN Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Computerworld (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computerworld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpj.jpeg
THE PLAN Journal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computerworld.jpeg
Computerworld
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Computerworld company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to THE PLAN Journal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Computerworld company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to THE PLAN Journal company.

In the current year, Computerworld company and THE PLAN Journal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Computerworld company nor THE PLAN Journal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Computerworld company nor THE PLAN Journal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Computerworld company nor THE PLAN Journal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither THE PLAN Journal company nor Computerworld company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither THE PLAN Journal nor Computerworld holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither THE PLAN Journal company nor Computerworld company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Computerworld company employs more people globally than THE PLAN Journal company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither THE PLAN Journal nor Computerworld holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither THE PLAN Journal nor Computerworld holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither THE PLAN Journal nor Computerworld holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither THE PLAN Journal nor Computerworld holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither THE PLAN Journal nor Computerworld holds HIPAA certification.

Neither THE PLAN Journal nor Computerworld holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References