Comparison Overview

TPI Aspen Forum

VS

PROSPEKTIKER

TPI Aspen Forum

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

This premier event gathers leaders from business, government and academia to discuss and debate key public policy issues affecting innovation, technology, and communications. ​ Since 2010, more than 850 policymakers and thought leaders have convened at the St. Regis resort for provocative discussions and riveting keynotes on topics including U.S. competitiveness and innovation, broadband penetration, and entertainment distribution models, to name a few. Each year’s agenda touches on timely themes and pertinent issues driving public policy and regulatory decisions and how they may affect tech, communications and content industries. The depth of discussions, featuring both industry leaders and academic experts, makes the event a unique experience.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PROSPEKTIKER

Parque Empresarial Zuatzu, Edif. Urumea, Planta 1ª, Local 1, Zubiberri Bidea 31, Donostia - San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, ES, 20018
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Empresa creada en 1987, es una estructura independiente de reflexión y de estudios prospectivo-estratégicos dirigida tanto al sector público como al privado y destinada a examinar cuáles son los futuros posibles que oculta el mundo contemporáneo y que se basa en tres convicciones: "El porvenir no nos viene determinado"​. "El porvenir se construye. No existirá libertad de elección y de actuación sin que exista una actitud de previsión"​. "El porvenir está sujeto a grandes dosis de incertidumbre y de riesgo. Para no hipotecarlo, es necesario optimizar los medios y recursos disponibles, utilizando la prospectiva estratégica como herramienta de trabajo"​. Los objetivos en los que se centra la labor de Prospektiker son los siguientes: - Detectar las innovaciones, ideas y hechos portadores de futuro. - Descubrir las tendencias de primer orden y emergentes que determinan el abanico de los futuros posibles. - Evaluar las inflexiones posibles, los impactos que puedan entrañar y las apuestas que son necesarias afrontar. - Asegurar un papel de vigía respecto a los factores que ejercen una influencia sobre la evolución a medio y largo plazo, identificando los problemas y examinando aquellas estrategias que puedan en consecuencia ser adoptadas. Trabajamos en red con una importante red de socios, tanto locales como internacionales. Nuestra actividad se centra en: - Asesoramiento en gestión y evaluación de políticas y programas. - Desarrollo de observatorios y sistemas vigías. - Planificación prospectivo-estratégica.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-aspen-forum.jpeg
TPI Aspen Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prospektiker.jpeg
PROSPEKTIKER
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TPI Aspen Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PROSPEKTIKER
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPI Aspen Forum in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PROSPEKTIKER in 2025.

Incident History — TPI Aspen Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPI Aspen Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PROSPEKTIKER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PROSPEKTIKER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-aspen-forum.jpeg
TPI Aspen Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prospektiker.jpeg
PROSPEKTIKER
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TPI Aspen Forum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PROSPEKTIKER company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PROSPEKTIKER company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TPI Aspen Forum company.

In the current year, PROSPEKTIKER company and TPI Aspen Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PROSPEKTIKER company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PROSPEKTIKER company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PROSPEKTIKER company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum company nor PROSPEKTIKER company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor PROSPEKTIKER holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum company nor PROSPEKTIKER company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor PROSPEKTIKER holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor PROSPEKTIKER holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor PROSPEKTIKER holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor PROSPEKTIKER holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor PROSPEKTIKER holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor PROSPEKTIKER holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X