Comparison Overview

TPI Aspen Forum

VS

Openfields

TPI Aspen Forum

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

This premier event gathers leaders from business, government and academia to discuss and debate key public policy issues affecting innovation, technology, and communications. ​ Since 2010, more than 850 policymakers and thought leaders have convened at the St. Regis resort for provocative discussions and riveting keynotes on topics including U.S. competitiveness and innovation, broadband penetration, and entertainment distribution models, to name a few. Each year’s agenda touches on timely themes and pertinent issues driving public policy and regulatory decisions and how they may affect tech, communications and content industries. The depth of discussions, featuring both industry leaders and academic experts, makes the event a unique experience.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Openfields

100 W Washington St, GREENVILLE, South Carolina, 29601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Openfields was founded in 2014 with the vision of bringing the most creative, strategic tools for innovation from across sectors to bear on our most pressing, complex social challenges. Our name, Openfields, comes from the insight that these challenges cannot addressed from a single field of work or discipline of learning, but demand leaders, organizations, and networks that are able to work within and beyond traditional boundaries. The fields of work are open and we need new ways to learn, think, and work together. We've learned that to achieve different outcomes we have to embrace different ways of working. Like other consulting firms we bring proven processes and experienced experts to help clients solve complex problems and develop big ideas. Unlike other firms we operate primarily as a collaborative team, empowering your organization with a new level of learning, capacity, and creativity. We deliver immediate solutions, while helping your organization grow and adapt. Openfields is a collaborative team of entrepreneurial, curious, and committed problem solvers. We think critically about our shared history, are constantly learning, and we actively cultivate creative visions about what is possible in the future.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-aspen-forum.jpeg
TPI Aspen Forum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opnflds.jpeg
Openfields
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TPI Aspen Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Openfields
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPI Aspen Forum in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Openfields in 2025.

Incident History — TPI Aspen Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPI Aspen Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Openfields (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Openfields cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpi-aspen-forum.jpeg
TPI Aspen Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/opnflds.jpeg
Openfields
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TPI Aspen Forum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Openfields company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Openfields company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TPI Aspen Forum company.

In the current year, Openfields company and TPI Aspen Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Openfields company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Openfields company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Openfields company nor TPI Aspen Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum company nor Openfields company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor Openfields holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum company nor Openfields company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor Openfields holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor Openfields holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor Openfields holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor Openfields holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor Openfields holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TPI Aspen Forum nor Openfields holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X