Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TP-Link Systems Inc.TP-Link Systems Inc.
VS
Samsung ElectronicsSamsung Electronics
TP-Link Systems Inc.

TP-Link Systems Inc.

10 Mauchly, Irvine, 92618, US

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.tp-link.com/us/
671/1000Weak

Headquartered in the United States, TP-Link Systems Inc. is a global provider of reliable networking devices and smart home products, consistently ranked as the world's top provider of Wi-Fi devices. The company is committed to delivering innovative products that enhanc...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:382
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

129 Samsung-ro, Suwon-Si, 443-742, KR

Last Update: 10/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.samsung.com
752/1000Fair

Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medica...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:167,492
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TP-Link Systems Inc.

TP-Link Systems Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

TP-Link Systems Inc. has 47.06% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samsung Electronics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TP-Link Systems Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TP-Link Systems Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Samsung Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TP-Link Systems Inc.

TP-Link Systems Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TP-1776673453
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TP-1780381426
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TP-1775579951
Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SAM5932959110525
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DIM4992449100425
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAM945080725

FAQ

Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. company and Samsung Electronics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Samsung Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Samsung Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TP-Link Systems Inc. or Samsung Electronics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TP-Link Systems Inc. or Samsung Electronics ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Samsung Electronics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TP-Link Systems Inc. and Samsung Electronics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA