Comparison Overview

Tozers LLP

VS

OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP

Tozers LLP

Broadwalk House, Exeter, EX11UA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

With our head office in Exeter and branches in Teignmouth and Newton Abbot, we offer a high quality legal service to businesses and individuals. We also have a national reputation in business sectors such as Residential and Holiday Parks, Registered Landlords of social housing, Charities, Schools and Equine Law. We recognise the need for costs structures which suit our clients and so we offer fee packages which combine fixed fees and discounted hourly rates.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP

255 California Street, San Francisco, 94111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Ogloza Fortney + Friedman is a litigation boutique specializing in both plaintiff and defense-side business disputes. We represents clients in breach of contract and fraud cases, partnership, LLC and shareholder disputes, M&A and post-acquisition disputes, insurance coverage disputes (on behalf of policyholders), trade secret litigation, employment litigation, and other complex business disputes. We also represents clients in internal investigations and SEC investigation and enforcement actions. Ogloza Fortney + Friedman's partners spent years together working at one of the world's largest law firms prior to the firm's founding. We offer our clients the benefit of deep big firm experience combined with a small firm ethos that emphasizes an efficient, goal-oriented approach to business litigation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tozers.jpeg
Tozers LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogloza-fortney-llp.jpeg
OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tozers LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tozers LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Tozers LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tozers LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tozers.jpeg
Tozers LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ogloza-fortney-llp.jpeg
OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tozers LLP company and OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tozers LLP company.

In the current year, OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company and Tozers LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company nor Tozers LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company nor Tozers LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company nor Tozers LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tozers LLP company nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tozers LLP nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tozers LLP company nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tozers LLP company employs more people globally than OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Tozers LLP nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tozers LLP nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tozers LLP nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tozers LLP nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tozers LLP nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tozers LLP nor OGLOZA FORTNEY + FRIEDMAN LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X