Comparison Overview

Toys"R"Us

VS

Fozzy Group

Toys"R"Us

Parsippany, New Jersey, US, 07054
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Toys“R”Us is a beloved brand known all around the world—and we know how to have fun! For over 70 years we've been the toy authority and ambassadors of all things play. Our new vision looks beyond traditional retail for a re-imagined, immersive experience for kids of all ages. We've got a whole new way to play, and we can't wait to share it with you!

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 13,539
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fozzy Group

13 Kalachevskaya Str. Kiev, 02090, UA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Fozzy Group is one of the largest trade industrial groups in Ukraine and one of the leading Ukrainian retailers, with over 700 outlets all around the country. Besides retail, the group's businesses include food production, and restaurants. Fozzy Group is introducing modern solutions in all areas of its activity. By investing in improving its business processes, the group has achieved leading positions in the retail market. By performing retail chains logistics through its own distribution centers, Fozzy Group has been able to ensure the timely delivery of food to its stores all over Ukraine. In addition, the group operates its own quality control system, ensuring full compliance with its standards in goods storage, transportation and sale. Since its inception in 1997, Fozzy Group has focused on making innovative business improvements, creating new opportunities for the market and further developing the industry as a whole.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toysrus1.jpeg
Toys"R"Us
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fozzy-group.jpeg
Fozzy Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toys"R"Us
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fozzy Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toys"R"Us in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fozzy Group in 2025.

Incident History — Toys"R"Us (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toys"R"Us cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fozzy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fozzy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toysrus1.jpeg
Toys"R"Us
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fozzy-group.jpeg
Fozzy Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Toys"R"Us company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fozzy Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fozzy Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Toys"R"Us company.

In the current year, Fozzy Group company and Toys"R"Us company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fozzy Group company nor Toys"R"Us company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fozzy Group company nor Toys"R"Us company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fozzy Group company nor Toys"R"Us company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Toys"R"Us company nor Fozzy Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Toys"R"Us nor Fozzy Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Toys"R"Us company nor Fozzy Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Toys"R"Us company employs more people globally than Fozzy Group company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Toys"R"Us nor Fozzy Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toys"R"Us nor Fozzy Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toys"R"Us nor Fozzy Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toys"R"Us nor Fozzy Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toys"R"Us nor Fozzy Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toys"R"Us nor Fozzy Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N