Comparison Overview

Toyota Motor Corporation

VS

BMW Group

Toyota Motor Corporation

1 Toyota-Cho, None, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture, JP, 471-8571
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.toyota-global.com/

Toyota Motor Corporation is a global automotive industry leader manufacturing vehicles in 27 countries or regions and marketing the company’s products in over 170 countries and regions. Founded in 1937 and headquartered in Toyota City, Japan, Toyota Motor Corporation employs nearly 350,000 people globally.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 31,153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4
View Profile

BMW Group

Petuelring 130, Munich, DE, 80788
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bmwgroup.com/en/general/imprint.html

With its four brands BMW, MINI, Rolls-Royce and BMW Motorrad, the BMW Group is the world’s leading pre-mium manufacturer of automobiles and motorcycles and also provides premium financial services. The BMW Group production network comprises over 30 production sites worldwide; the company has a global sales network in more than 140 countries. In 2024, the BMW Group sold over 2.45 million passenger vehicles and more than 210,000 motorcycles worldwide. The profit before tax in the financial year 2024 was € 11.0 billion on revenues amounting to € 142.4 billion. As of 31 December 2024, the BMW Group had a workforce of 159,104 employees. The economic success of the BMW Group has always been based on long-term thinking and responsible action. Sustainability is a key element of the BMW Group’s corporate strategy and covers all products from the supply chain and production to the end of their useful life.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 48,747
Subsidiaries: 75
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toyota.jpeg
Toyota Motor Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bmw-group.jpeg
BMW Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toyota Motor Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BMW Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Toyota Motor Corporation has 233.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

BMW Group has 66.67% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Toyota Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toyota Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BMW Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BMW Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toyota.jpeg
Toyota Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Salesforce Customer Instances, OAuth Abuse, Third-Party App Compromises (e.g., Salesloft’s Drift/Drift), VPN Masking for Exfiltration, Weak 2FA Enforcement
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Extortion), Data Theft for Resale/Leverage, Public Disclosure Threats, Litigation Support as Pressure Tactic
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Vulnerabilities within interconnected systems, Advanced reconnaissance techniques, Persistent access mechanisms
Motivation: Strategic objectives, Political objectives, Reputation damage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Improperly setup cloud services
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bmw-group.jpeg
BMW Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial extortion, cybercrime
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration
Motivation: Reconnaissance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

BMW Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toyota Motor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to BMW Group company.

In the current year, Toyota Motor Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than BMW Group company.

Both BMW Group company and Toyota Motor Corporation company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Both BMW Group company and Toyota Motor Corporation company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while BMW Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation company nor BMW Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor BMW Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BMW Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Toyota Motor Corporation company.

BMW Group company employs more people globally than Toyota Motor Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor BMW Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor BMW Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor BMW Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor BMW Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor BMW Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor BMW Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References