Comparison Overview

Town of Bourne

VS

Rijkswaterstaat

Town of Bourne

24 Perry Ave, Bourne, Massachusetts, US, 02532
Last Update: 2026-01-18

By maximizing opportunities for social and economic development while retaining an attractive, sustainable and secure coastline and environment for the enjoyment of all, the Town of Bourne is a proud community that embraces change through the following community values: ~ Customer Focus ~ Integrity ~Innovative Thinking ~Accountability ~Stewardship ~Excellence ~Sustainability ~Inclusiveness

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Rijkswaterstaat

Koningskade 4, Den Haag, 2500 EX, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-25

Rijkswaterstaat is de uitvoeringsorganisatie van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. We beheren en ontwikkelen de rijkswegen, -vaarwegen en –wateren en zetten in op een duurzame leefomgeving. Samen met andere organisaties werken we aan een land dat beschermd is tegen overstromingen. Waar voldoende groen is, en voldoende en schoon water. En waar je vlot en veilig van A naar B kunt. Samenwerken aan een veilig, leefbaar en bereikbaar Nederland. Dat is Rijkswaterstaat. Bij Rijkswaterstaat werk je mee aan de toekomst van Nederland met de ruimte om jezelf te blijven ontwikkelen. Gun jezelf een baan met toekomst. Gun jezelf Rijkswaterstaat.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 12,096
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/townofbourne.jpeg
Town of Bourne
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijkswaterstaat.jpeg
Rijkswaterstaat
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Town of Bourne
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rijkswaterstaat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Town of Bourne in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijkswaterstaat in 2026.

Incident History — Town of Bourne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Town of Bourne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rijkswaterstaat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijkswaterstaat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/townofbourne.jpeg
Town of Bourne
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing (Spoofed Emails), Unknown (Network Compromise)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijkswaterstaat.jpeg
Rijkswaterstaat
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rijkswaterstaat company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Town of Bourne company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Town of Bourne company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rijkswaterstaat company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rijkswaterstaat company and Town of Bourne company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rijkswaterstaat company nor Town of Bourne company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Town of Bourne company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Rijkswaterstaat company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rijkswaterstaat company nor Town of Bourne company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Town of Bourne company nor Rijkswaterstaat company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Town of Bourne nor Rijkswaterstaat holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rijkswaterstaat company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Town of Bourne company.

Rijkswaterstaat company employs more people globally than Town of Bourne company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Town of Bourne nor Rijkswaterstaat holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Town of Bourne nor Rijkswaterstaat holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Town of Bourne nor Rijkswaterstaat holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Town of Bourne nor Rijkswaterstaat holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Town of Bourne nor Rijkswaterstaat holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Town of Bourne nor Rijkswaterstaat holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N