Comparison Overview

Tower Safety Services, Inc.

VS

BITZER México

Tower Safety Services, Inc.

204 East Second Avenue, San Mateo, CA, 94401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Tower Safety Services is a San Francisco Bay Area based survey and consultation firm, specializing in building façade access safety. Tower is uniquely qualified to observe, assess, and document exterior building maintenance systems and related workplaces. Since 2000, Tower has provided specialized consultation and surveying services to its clients. Tower has established itself as an industry leader, and actively participates in the development of safety standards and regulations. Over the years, Tower has revealed itself as an effective force for implementing safety advancements and raising awareness in our industry. These improvements not only serve to protect workers and pedestrians, but also enable building owners to accurately assess and control liability exposures. Through consistent, detailed, and accurate services, Tower enables it's clients to make the world a safer place!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BITZER México

Av. Adolfo Lopez Mateos 221, Guadalupe, 67110, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

BITZER México S. de R.L. de C.V. es una empresa Mexicana, subsidiaria de BITZER Kühlmaschinenbau GmbH, nuestra casa matriz esta en Alemania. La misión de BITZER México es ofrecer en México todos los productos que BITZER diseña y fabrica a nivel mundial, convirtiéndonos en el líder en soluciones para la industria de la Refrigeración Comercial y el Aire Acondicionado. Lea nuestra política de privacidad e impresión para obtener información general: https://www.bitzer.de/mx/es/pie-de-imprenta https://www.bitzer.de/mx/es/politica-de-privacidad

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tower-safety-services-inc-.jpeg
Tower Safety Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bitzer-mexico.jpeg
BITZER México
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tower Safety Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BITZER México
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tower Safety Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BITZER México in 2025.

Incident History — Tower Safety Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tower Safety Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BITZER México (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BITZER México cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tower-safety-services-inc-.jpeg
Tower Safety Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bitzer-mexico.jpeg
BITZER México
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tower Safety Services, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BITZER México company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BITZER México company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tower Safety Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, BITZER México company and Tower Safety Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BITZER México company nor Tower Safety Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BITZER México company nor Tower Safety Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BITZER México company nor Tower Safety Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. company nor BITZER México company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. nor BITZER México holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BITZER México company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tower Safety Services, Inc. company.

BITZER México company employs more people globally than Tower Safety Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. nor BITZER México holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. nor BITZER México holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. nor BITZER México holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. nor BITZER México holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. nor BITZER México holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tower Safety Services, Inc. nor BITZER México holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H