Comparison Overview

Tour-Mate Systems Ltd.

VS

Computer History Museum

Tour-Mate Systems Ltd.

137 St. Regis Crescent, Toronto, Ontario, M3J1Y6, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. produces interpretive solutions and multimedia tours for museums, art galleries, historic sites, botanical gardens, national parks, corporate events and temporary exhibitions. We have offices in Toronto, Ontario and Victor, New York, and our solutions can be found in Australia, Barbados, Canada, China, India, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Macao, Mexico, Puerto Rico, South Africa, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and across the United States. Founder Neil Poch formed the company in response to the frustration of being unable to find adequate interpretation while on vacation in 1988. For the past two decades, Tour-Mate audio and multimedia tours and products have been featured at prominent attractions such as Mount Rushmore, The Alamo, the Grand Canyon, Carlsbad Caverns National Park, the Empire State Building, the Montreal Museum of Fine Art and numerous other locations around the globe. We are a company with a heart. We believe that the world we live in, with all of it’s history and beauty, should be accessible and available to all people. That is why most of our solutions come with accessibility features for the visually impaired, hearing impaired, and differently-abled people. We offer an eco-friendly line of products that are used in many National Parks and gardens around the world, with little to no negative output. Tour-Mate also donated the audio tour equipment for the Ground Zero Museum Workshop honoring the sacrifice of the first responders at 911.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Computer History Museum

1401 N Shoreline Blvd, Mountain View, CA, 94043, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

CHM DECODES TECHNOLOGY FOR EVERYONE. From the heart of Silicon Valley, we share insights gleaned from our research, our events, and our incomparable collection of computing artifacts and oral histories to convene, inform, and inspire people to build a better world. WE BELIEVE: - Technological progress should be in service to human progress. - Technology created and applied ethically can expand access to opportunity. - Our computational past informs our digital present with lessons that span generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 154
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tour-mate-systems-ltd-.jpeg
Tour-Mate Systems Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computer-history-museum.jpeg
Computer History Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tour-Mate Systems Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Computer History Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computer History Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Computer History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computer History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tour-mate-systems-ltd-.jpeg
Tour-Mate Systems Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computer-history-museum.jpeg
Computer History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Computer History Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Computer History Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company.

In the current year, Computer History Museum company and Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Computer History Museum company nor Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Computer History Museum company nor Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Computer History Museum company nor Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company nor Computer History Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. nor Computer History Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company nor Computer History Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Computer History Museum company employs more people globally than Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. nor Computer History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. nor Computer History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. nor Computer History Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. nor Computer History Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. nor Computer History Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tour-Mate Systems Ltd. nor Computer History Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H