Comparison Overview

TouchPointe

VS

Broward House

TouchPointe

US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Touchpointe is the #1 resource for those diagnosed with cancer. We are fully committed to providing comprehensive answers and unwavering support throughout every stage of their wellness journey. At Touchpointe, we understand the overwhelming challenges and uncertainties that come with a cancer diagnosis. That's why our dedicated team is here to guide and empower individuals, equipping them with the knowledge and resources they need to make informed decisions and navigate their unique path to wellness. With our compassionate approach, we will ensure that every individual on this journey feels deeply supported every step of the way. By fostering a community that understands their unique needs, we aim to provide a sense of solace, knowledge, and encouragement to everyone facing the complexities of cancer.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Broward House

1726 SE 3rd Ave, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Broward House is a not-for-profit social services organization with more than 35 years of experience providing services to our community impacted by HIV and other health concerns. Our Commitment to Health Equity Our mission is to improve the quality of life for individuals impacted with chronic health challenges, including HIV, by providing pathways to wellness. Broward House is dedicated to Rebuilding Lives. We focus on supporting the community through four pillars of service: Transitional Housing, Case Management, Behavioral Health Services, and Testing & Outreach.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/touchpointe.jpeg
TouchPointe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broward-house.jpeg
Broward House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TouchPointe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Broward House
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TouchPointe in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Broward House in 2025.

Incident History — TouchPointe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TouchPointe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Broward House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Broward House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/touchpointe.jpeg
TouchPointe
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broward-house.jpeg
Broward House
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TouchPointe company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Broward House company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Broward House company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TouchPointe company.

In the current year, Broward House company and TouchPointe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Broward House company nor TouchPointe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Broward House company nor TouchPointe company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Broward House company nor TouchPointe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TouchPointe company nor Broward House company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TouchPointe nor Broward House holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TouchPointe company nor Broward House company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Broward House company employs more people globally than TouchPointe company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither TouchPointe nor Broward House holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TouchPointe nor Broward House holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TouchPointe nor Broward House holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TouchPointe nor Broward House holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TouchPointe nor Broward House holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TouchPointe nor Broward House holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H