Comparison Overview

Totalplay

VS

KPN

Totalplay

Avenida San Jerónimo 252 Álvaro Obregón, Mexico City 01090, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.totalplay.com

Somos una empresa orgullosamente mexicana, líder en tecnología, telecomunicaciones y entretenimiento. Estamos siempre a la vanguardia con el objetivo de llevar a nuestros clientes lo mejor en conectividad, ya sea para que estén cerca de los que más quieren ó puedan alcanzar el éxito profesional gracias a la velocidad que brinda la tecnología de fibra óptica. Nuestro impulso es el equipo que hemos formado, personas con talento, iniciativa, entusiastas y apasionados, que buscan siempre caminar unidos para llevar a más de 20 ciudades de la República Mexicana un servicio de excelencia. Queremos que nuestros clientes sean parte del camino al futuro y vivan al máximo la experiencia de la plataforma de conectividad y entretenimiento total.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

KPN

Wilhelminakade 123, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, 3072 AP, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kpn.com

Welkom bij de LinkedIn pagina van KPN. Sinds jaar en dag maakt KPN technologie toegankelijk. Hier leest u alles over de ontwikkelingen rondom de thema’s die KPN belangrijk vindt, zoals Het Nieuwe Leven & Werken, Veiligheid & Privacy en ICT-infrastructuur. Ook een transparante en betrouwbare dienstverlener zijn, efficiency in de zorg en duurzaam ondernemen staan bij ons hoog in het vaandel. Op onze pagina blijft u op de hoogte van het laatste nieuws rondom onze activiteiten, de thema’s in uw leven waarin technologie een rol speelt en onze producten en services op het gebied van ICT. Ontdek samen met ons voor u en uw organisatie de beste oplossingen en voel je vrij.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 17,597
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalplay.jpeg
Totalplay
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpn.jpeg
KPN
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Totalplay
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KPN
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Totalplay in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPN in 2025.

Incident History — Totalplay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Totalplay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KPN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalplay.jpeg
Totalplay
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpn.jpeg
KPN
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KPN company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Totalplay company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KPN company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Totalplay company.

In the current year, KPN company and Totalplay company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KPN company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KPN company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KPN company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Totalplay company nor KPN company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Totalplay nor KPN holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KPN company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Totalplay company.

KPN company employs more people globally than Totalplay company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Totalplay nor KPN holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor KPN holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor KPN holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor KPN holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Totalplay nor KPN holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Totalplay nor KPN holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References