Comparison Overview

Totalplay

VS

e& UAE

Totalplay

Avenida San Jerónimo 252 Álvaro Obregón, Mexico City 01090, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Somos una empresa orgullosamente mexicana, líder en tecnología, telecomunicaciones y entretenimiento. Estamos siempre a la vanguardia con el objetivo de llevar a nuestros clientes lo mejor en conectividad, ya sea para que estén cerca de los que más quieren ó puedan alcanzar el éxito profesional gracias a la velocidad que brinda la tecnología de fibra óptica. Nuestro impulso es el equipo que hemos formado, personas con talento, iniciativa, entusiastas y apasionados, que buscan siempre caminar unidos para llevar a más de 20 ciudades de la República Mexicana un servicio de excelencia. Queremos que nuestros clientes sean parte del camino al futuro y vivan al máximo la experiencia de la plataforma de conectividad y entretenimiento total.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

e& UAE

Sheikh Rashid Bin Saeed Al Maktoum Street, Abu Dhabi, AE, 3838
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

(Formerly etisalat UAE) For more than four decades, we have connected people and now we’ve evolved to become the digital telco of the future. Our mission is to grow, transform and excel as the region’s technology leader while enhancing digital customer experience and operation agility. e& UAE offers digital experiences that cater to your new lifestyle and demands beyond just telecom and are not limited to gaming, health, and insurance. We will continue to be your trusted partner and advisor, enabling connectivity and everything beyond, accelerating the digital world and pioneering future-forward spaces like private networks, autonomous vehicles, and AI. Together, we embark on this new era of e& UAE and step into a new world of possibilities. We are etisalat and so much more.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 44,506
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalplay.jpeg
Totalplay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eanduae.jpeg
e& UAE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Totalplay
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
e& UAE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Totalplay in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for e& UAE in 2025.

Incident History — Totalplay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Totalplay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — e& UAE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

e& UAE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalplay.jpeg
Totalplay
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eanduae.jpeg
e& UAE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

e& UAE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Totalplay company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, e& UAE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Totalplay company.

In the current year, e& UAE company and Totalplay company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither e& UAE company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither e& UAE company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither e& UAE company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Totalplay company nor e& UAE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Totalplay nor e& UAE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

e& UAE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Totalplay company.

e& UAE company employs more people globally than Totalplay company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Totalplay nor e& UAE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor e& UAE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor e& UAE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor e& UAE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Totalplay nor e& UAE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Totalplay nor e& UAE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N