Comparison Overview

Totalplay

VS

BT Group

Totalplay

Avenida San Jerónimo 252 Álvaro Obregón, Mexico City 01090, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Somos una empresa orgullosamente mexicana, líder en tecnología, telecomunicaciones y entretenimiento. Estamos siempre a la vanguardia con el objetivo de llevar a nuestros clientes lo mejor en conectividad, ya sea para que estén cerca de los que más quieren ó puedan alcanzar el éxito profesional gracias a la velocidad que brinda la tecnología de fibra óptica. Nuestro impulso es el equipo que hemos formado, personas con talento, iniciativa, entusiastas y apasionados, que buscan siempre caminar unidos para llevar a más de 20 ciudades de la República Mexicana un servicio de excelencia. Queremos que nuestros clientes sean parte del camino al futuro y vivan al máximo la experiencia de la plataforma de conectividad y entretenimiento total.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BT Group

One Braham, London, undefined, E1 8EE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

We’re one of the world’s leading communications services companies. At BT Group, the solutions we sell are integral to modern life. Our purpose is as simple as it is ambitious: we connect for good. There are no limits to what people can do when they connect. And as technology changes our world, connections are becoming even more important to everyday life. Today, that’s truer than ever. The connections we make are helping solve the world’s biggest challenges such as the global pandemic, climate change and cyber security. Through the power of technology, we’re supporting customers to live, work and play together better.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 75,585
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalplay.jpeg
Totalplay
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bt.jpeg
BT Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Totalplay
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BT Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Totalplay in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BT Group in 2025.

Incident History — Totalplay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Totalplay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BT Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BT Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalplay.jpeg
Totalplay
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bt.jpeg
BT Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exposed Default Password
Motivation: Unintentional Exposure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Totalplay company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BT Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BT Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Totalplay company has not reported any.

In the current year, BT Group company and Totalplay company have not reported any cyber incidents.

BT Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Totalplay company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BT Group company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BT Group company nor Totalplay company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Totalplay company nor BT Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Totalplay nor BT Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BT Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Totalplay company.

BT Group company employs more people globally than Totalplay company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Totalplay nor BT Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor BT Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor BT Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Totalplay nor BT Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Totalplay nor BT Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Totalplay nor BT Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H