Comparison Overview

TotalEnergies

VS

RussNeft

TotalEnergies

2, place Jean Millier - La Défense 6, Paris La Défense Cedex, FR, 92078
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 800 and 849

Have you ever thought of offering your skills and expertise to a multinational company? Give your best to better energy and make the commitment with TotalEnergies. With over 500-plus professions in 130 countries, we offer high safety and environmental standards, strong ethical values, an innovation culture and wide-ranging career development. Be part of the global team whose mission is already shared by 105,000 employees : to be a world-class player in the energy transition

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 79,389
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

RussNeft

69, Pyatnitskaya st Moscow, RU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

ОАО Oil and Gas Company «RussNeft» came into existence in September 2002 . The structure of OAO NK “RussNeft” counts 24 upstream enterprises, 2 refineries, its own distribution net of gas filling stations. Geographic reach of “RussNeft” covers 12 regions of Russia and CIS: Khanty-Mansi Autonomous District, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District, Tomsk, Ulianovsk, Penza, Briansk, Saratov, Kirov and Orenburg regions, the Republics of Udmurtia and Belarus. The head office of the Company is in Moscow. The Company is developing 167 oil and gas fields. The net effective pay of the company exceeds 600 million tons. The total amount of oil produced by the enterprises of the company is 13 million tons. In accordance with the approved long-term strategy of development “RussNeft is going within a 7-year period to build up the volume of production by more than one third. The total throughput of the refineries is 5.134 million tons. Since 2011 engine fuels of the Company meet ecological class Euro 3 quality standard.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalenergies.jpeg
TotalEnergies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russneft.jpeg
RussNeft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TotalEnergies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RussNeft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TotalEnergies in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RussNeft in 2025.

Incident History — TotalEnergies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TotalEnergies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RussNeft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RussNeft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalenergies.jpeg
TotalEnergies
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russneft.jpeg
RussNeft
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TotalEnergies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RussNeft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TotalEnergies company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RussNeft company has not reported any.

In the current year, RussNeft company and TotalEnergies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RussNeft company nor TotalEnergies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RussNeft company nor TotalEnergies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

TotalEnergies company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while RussNeft company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TotalEnergies company nor RussNeft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TotalEnergies nor RussNeft holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TotalEnergies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RussNeft company.

TotalEnergies company employs more people globally than RussNeft company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither TotalEnergies nor RussNeft holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TotalEnergies nor RussNeft holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TotalEnergies nor RussNeft holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TotalEnergies nor RussNeft holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TotalEnergies nor RussNeft holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TotalEnergies nor RussNeft holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N