Comparison Overview

Toptal

VS

NetSuite

Toptal

Work from Anywhere, Remote, OO, 00000
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 700 and 749

With over $4 billion in global payments, $200 million in annual revenue, 70k contracts signed — Toptal is the world’s largest fully remote workforce.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 6,072
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

NetSuite

2300 Oracle Way, Austin, 78741, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1998, Oracle NetSuite is the world’s first cloud company. For more than 25 years, NetSuite has helped businesses gain the insight, control, and agility to build and grow a successful business. First focused on financials and ERP, we now provide an AI-powered unified business system that includes inventory management, HR, professional services automation, and omnichannel commerce, used by more than 43,000 customers in 219 countries and dependent territories.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 16,597
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
17
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toptal.jpeg
Toptal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netsuite.jpeg
NetSuite
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toptal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NetSuite
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toptal in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NetSuite in 2026.

Incident History — Toptal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toptal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NetSuite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NetSuite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toptal.jpeg
Toptal
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: GitHub Account Compromise, NPM Package Compromise
Motivation: Data Theft, System Wipe
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netsuite.jpeg
NetSuite
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network packets
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Motivation: Extortion (response demanded by March 19)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NetSuite company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toptal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NetSuite company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Toptal company.

In the current year, NetSuite company has reported more cyber incidents than Toptal company.

NetSuite company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Toptal company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both NetSuite company and Toptal company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

NetSuite company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Toptal company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NetSuite company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Toptal company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Toptal nor NetSuite holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NetSuite company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Toptal company.

NetSuite company employs more people globally than Toptal company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Toptal nor NetSuite holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toptal nor NetSuite holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toptal nor NetSuite holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toptal nor NetSuite holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toptal nor NetSuite holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toptal nor NetSuite holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H