Comparison Overview

Topstone Solicitors

VS

CCdigitallaw

Topstone Solicitors

792-794 London Road, London, undefined, CR7 6JB, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Topstone Solicitors is a firm of solicitors based in London, United Kingdom. The firm is committed to providing quality assured legal services and access to justice for individuals, businesses, corporate organisations and the general public. Our areas of expertise include, but not limited to, Immigration (both corporate and private) Corporate & Company Law, Conveyancing, Housing (Landlord and Tenant), Employment, Family Law, crime, Civil Litigation, Will & Probate and Personal Injury. Please visit our website www.topstonesolicitors.com for more details about our services. We serve all clients irrespective of race, colour, ethnic or national origins, sex, marital status or sexual orientation, disability, age, religion or belief. We have a reputation for offering the highest levels of client care and continuous record of obtaining good case outcomes for our clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CCdigitallaw

Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, None, Lugano, Ticino, CH, 6900
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

CCdigitallaw is a national Competence Center in Digital Law that supports Swiss Higher Education Institutions (students, academic and administrative staff) in dealing with legal questions related to the digitalization process and the use of new media and technologies. To do so, the Center offers three main services: 1) different kind of online resources (FAQs, knowledge base, case studies), which help users finding answers to their daily digital law questions; 2) a wide range of online and offline training activities, and 3) an advising and coaching service. All services can be accessed through a centralized online platform (www.ccdigitallaw.ch) and are available in four languages (German, Italian, French, English).

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topstone-solicitors.jpeg
Topstone Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ccdigitallaw.jpeg
CCdigitallaw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Topstone Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CCdigitallaw
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Topstone Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CCdigitallaw in 2025.

Incident History — Topstone Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Topstone Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CCdigitallaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CCdigitallaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/topstone-solicitors.jpeg
Topstone Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ccdigitallaw.jpeg
CCdigitallaw
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Topstone Solicitors company and CCdigitallaw company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CCdigitallaw company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Topstone Solicitors company.

In the current year, CCdigitallaw company and Topstone Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CCdigitallaw company nor Topstone Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CCdigitallaw company nor Topstone Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CCdigitallaw company nor Topstone Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Topstone Solicitors company nor CCdigitallaw company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Topstone Solicitors nor CCdigitallaw holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Topstone Solicitors company nor CCdigitallaw company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Topstone Solicitors nor CCdigitallaw holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Topstone Solicitors nor CCdigitallaw holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Topstone Solicitors nor CCdigitallaw holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Topstone Solicitors nor CCdigitallaw holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Topstone Solicitors nor CCdigitallaw holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Topstone Solicitors nor CCdigitallaw holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X