Comparison Overview

Top Cow Productions

VS

The Review

Top Cow Productions

undefined, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.topcow.com

Top Cow Productions, Inc., a Los Angeles-based entertainment company, was founded in December of 1992 by artist Marc Silvestri, who also co-founded Image Comics earlier that same year. Top Cow currently publishes its line of comic books in 21 languages in over 55 different countries. The company has launched 20 franchises (18 original and two licensed) in the industry’s Top 10, seven at #1, a feat accomplished by no other publisher in the last two decades.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thereviewcolorado.com

The Review is a monthly publication serving the advertising, marketing and media industries in Colorado and over 15 organizations involved. Three of these organizations carry their newsletters in the magazine including American Marketing Association, Business Marketing Association and Rocky Mountain Direct Marketing Association. Each month's issue includes a feature pertinent to the industry, News Notes and a monthly calendar of organization events.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/top-cow-productions.jpeg
Top Cow Productions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-review.jpeg
The Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Top Cow Productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Top Cow Productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Review in 2025.

Incident History — Top Cow Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Top Cow Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/top-cow-productions.jpeg
Top Cow Productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-review.jpeg
The Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Top Cow Productions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Top Cow Productions company.

In the current year, The Review company and Top Cow Productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Review company nor Top Cow Productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Review company nor Top Cow Productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Review company nor Top Cow Productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor The Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Top Cow Productions nor The Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Top Cow Productions company nor The Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Top Cow Productions company employs more people globally than The Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Top Cow Productions nor The Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Top Cow Productions nor The Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Top Cow Productions nor The Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Top Cow Productions nor The Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Top Cow Productions nor The Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Top Cow Productions nor The Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References