Comparison Overview

Toms Skyline Design

VS

Imperial Sign Corporation

Toms Skyline Design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Toms Skyline Design is a Beaverton, Oregon based web design, web development and internet marketing solution provider. Tom Matteson began designing and developing websites in 1998. He also graduated summa cum laude from AIU, obtaining a Bachelor of Fine Arts in Visual Communications Degree; with a Concentration in Web Design. Toms Skyline Design’ process is all about you; listening to what you want, designing something you will enjoy, developing you a successful website, and ultimately providing you with a product you can be proud of. At Toms Skyline Design one of the primary objectives is that you to be so pleased with our work that you come back to us for all your future projects and refer us to your friends and business associates. When you are WOWED by this process and it knocks your socks off the likelihood of you coming back and referring others is more likely. So, delighting you from initial contact through completion of your project is the aim of Toms Skyline Design.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Imperial Sign Corporation

2821 Huntington Place, Port Coquitlam, BC V3C 4T3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

ISC is an award-winning design-build firm that specializes in illuminated signage and architectural lighting. Our team has delivered projects to clients from across North America and is proud to have produced customized signage and architectural lighting solutions for some of the world’s most innovative companies. Committed to supporting our clients, our people, our community and our planet, ISC prides itself on delivering a quality of product and service that is second to none. Let us show you how we can help your company to optimize its visual impact through incorporating innovative architectural lighting and signage solutions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toms-skyline-design.jpeg
Toms Skyline Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-sign-corporation.jpeg
Imperial Sign Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toms Skyline Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Imperial Sign Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toms Skyline Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imperial Sign Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Toms Skyline Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toms Skyline Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Imperial Sign Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imperial Sign Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toms-skyline-design.jpeg
Toms Skyline Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-sign-corporation.jpeg
Imperial Sign Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Toms Skyline Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Imperial Sign Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Imperial Sign Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Toms Skyline Design company.

In the current year, Imperial Sign Corporation company and Toms Skyline Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Imperial Sign Corporation company nor Toms Skyline Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Imperial Sign Corporation company nor Toms Skyline Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Imperial Sign Corporation company nor Toms Skyline Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Toms Skyline Design company nor Imperial Sign Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Toms Skyline Design nor Imperial Sign Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Toms Skyline Design company nor Imperial Sign Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Toms Skyline Design nor Imperial Sign Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toms Skyline Design nor Imperial Sign Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toms Skyline Design nor Imperial Sign Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toms Skyline Design nor Imperial Sign Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toms Skyline Design nor Imperial Sign Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toms Skyline Design nor Imperial Sign Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X