Comparison Overview

Todd Maughan Photography

VS

VisionOn

Todd Maughan Photography

None
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 750 and 799

To fascinate. In my mind, that’s the primary goal of commercial and editorial photography. Only after we’ve captivated the viewer can we tell a story, or convey an emotion, or build a brand effectively. Fascination heightens our intellectual focus. It deepens our emotional responses. Fascinate your audience with an image, and you’ve taken the first step in persuading them to take action; whether you’re building a brand or trying to change the world. I’ve photographed executives, protestors, survivors, and humanitarians. I’ve managed sets with models and stylists and assistants and creative directors. No matter the ultimate commercial or editorial goal, my primary mission is always clear: to fascinate. What fascinates me the most, is people. Human beings. Love. People. Relationships. Experiences. Those are the reasons I chose photography as a profession. My name is Todd Maughan. I’m a commercial and editorial photographer based in Madison, Wisconsin. I’m passionate about the art and craft of photography, and its ability to fascinate audiences. And I’m lucky, every day, to pour that passion into my clients’ projects.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VisionOn

1407 Broadway, New York, 10018, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

Vision On is New York’s top retoucher since 2002. With decades of retouching experience behind us — across some of the biggest names in fashion, beauty, food & beverage, and more — you can trust that your retouching needs are handled. Every brand has unique guidelines and every site has specific requirements. We handle retouching from top to bottom, delivering the images you want and the files exactly as requested. We pride ourselves on prompt delivery — with little back and forth along the way. ️Fortune 500 Brands Trust Us. Our client shortlist includes: E.l.f., Lacoste, Maybelline, Nike, Target, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Giorgio Armani, Neiman Marcus, and countless others. Let’s work together — [email protected]

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/todd-maughan-photography.jpeg
Todd Maughan Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vision-on.jpeg
VisionOn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Todd Maughan Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VisionOn
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Todd Maughan Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VisionOn in 2025.

Incident History — Todd Maughan Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Todd Maughan Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VisionOn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VisionOn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/todd-maughan-photography.jpeg
Todd Maughan Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vision-on.jpeg
VisionOn
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Todd Maughan Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VisionOn company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, VisionOn company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Todd Maughan Photography company.

In the current year, VisionOn company and Todd Maughan Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VisionOn company nor Todd Maughan Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VisionOn company nor Todd Maughan Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VisionOn company nor Todd Maughan Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography company nor VisionOn company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography nor VisionOn holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography company nor VisionOn company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VisionOn company employs more people globally than Todd Maughan Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography nor VisionOn holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography nor VisionOn holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography nor VisionOn holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography nor VisionOn holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography nor VisionOn holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Todd Maughan Photography nor VisionOn holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N