Comparison Overview

Todaytec

VS

Platinum Labels

Todaytec

6701 Northpark Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28216, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Todaytec is a thermal transfer ribbon manufacturer located in Charlotte, North Carolina. We have a full range of wax, wax-resin, and resin ribbons. We are committed to our customers and we always provide exceptional customer service. Todaytec is here to help your company grow and get the best quality ribbon for the best price! Committed to Customer Growth ------------------------------------ Your growth is Todaytec’s primary goal. We have the flexibility and competitiveness to deliver what you need, they way you need it. - Cost Leader - Lowest Minimums - Outbound Market Research - Inbound Lead Generation Support - On-site Training - In-field Sales Support - Branded, Aftermarket and Private Label options - Wax, Wax-Resin, and Resin thermal ribbons Contact us at 704-790-2440 for more information about how Todaytec can help you grow your Thermal Transfer Ribbon business!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Platinum Labels

Unit 2 Oakwood Mills, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD8 8EY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

We Make Garment Labels With Flair and Taste! The purpose of our products is to add style, margin and sales to your products, and that’s something our clients tell us we’re exceptionally successful at. We’re the only label manufacturer of our size and stature to offer a free design service, staffed by a team steeped in fashion branding. New design collections are published twice a year and there are dedicated advisers to help you every step of the way. What drives our success is the same as what drives yours. The determination to be innovative, different, trend-setting and brand building. We have brand appeal! Test our strength!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/todaytecnorthamerica.jpeg
Todaytec
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/platinum-labels.jpeg
Platinum Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Todaytec
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Platinum Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Todaytec in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Platinum Labels in 2025.

Incident History — Todaytec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Todaytec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Platinum Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Platinum Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/todaytecnorthamerica.jpeg
Todaytec
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/platinum-labels.jpeg
Platinum Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Todaytec company and Platinum Labels company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Platinum Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Todaytec company.

In the current year, Platinum Labels company and Todaytec company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Platinum Labels company nor Todaytec company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Platinum Labels company nor Todaytec company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Platinum Labels company nor Todaytec company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Todaytec company nor Platinum Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Todaytec nor Platinum Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Todaytec company nor Platinum Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Todaytec company employs more people globally than Platinum Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Todaytec nor Platinum Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Todaytec nor Platinum Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Todaytec nor Platinum Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Todaytec nor Platinum Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Todaytec nor Platinum Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Todaytec nor Platinum Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N