Comparison Overview

The Museum of Russian Art

VS

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

The Museum of Russian Art

5500 Stevens Avenue, Minneapolis, 55419, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tmora.org

The Museum of Russian Art collects, preserves, exhibits, and illuminates the rich artistic tapestry of Russia, past and present, through outstanding exhibitions and public programs for all audiences. The Museum upholds an independent voice and the freedom of expression to carry out its mission unconstrained by influence from foreign governments, political actors and/or corporate or individual interests.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)

264 South 23rd Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccaha.org/

The Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) has grown to be one of the largest nonprofit conservation centers in the country. Its wide array of services, sophisticated treatment facilities, innovative approaches, and highly trained and experienced staff have earned it a prominent and respected place in the conservation field. Our mission is to provide expertise and leadership in the preservation of the world's cultural heritage. CCAHA specializes in the treatment of works of art and artifacts on paper, such as drawings, prints, maps, posters, historic wallpaper, photographs, rare books, scrapbooks, and manuscripts, along with related materials like parchment and papyrus. CCAHA also offers digital imaging services, on-site consultations, educational programs and seminars, internships, and emergency conservation services.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tmora.jpeg
The Museum of Russian Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Museum of Russian Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Museum of Russian Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) in 2026.

Incident History — The Museum of Russian Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Museum of Russian Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tmora.jpeg
The Museum of Russian Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conservation-center-for-art-and-historic-artifacts.jpeg
Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Museum of Russian Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Museum of Russian Art company.

In the current year, Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company and The Museum of Russian Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art company nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) company employs more people globally than The Museum of Russian Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Conservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts (CCAHA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References