Comparison Overview

The Museum of Russian Art

VS

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center

The Museum of Russian Art

5500 Stevens Avenue, Minneapolis, 55419, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tmora.org

The Museum of Russian Art collects, preserves, exhibits, and illuminates the rich artistic tapestry of Russia, past and present, through outstanding exhibitions and public programs for all audiences. The Museum upholds an independent voice and the freedom of expression to carry out its mission unconstrained by influence from foreign governments, political actors and/or corporate or individual interests.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center

507 S 4th St, Enid, Oklahoma, 73701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799
https://csrhc.org/

The Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center is a museum and research center where visitors can explore the history of northwest Oklahoma. The Heritage Center includes a permanent exhibit gallery and temporary exhibit gallery that explore the history and culture of northwestern Oklahoma. The Humphrey Heritage Village, which is a collection of four historically significant buildings, includes the only remaining U.S. Land Office in Oklahoma. The Center and the grounds are fully accessible to all visitors.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tmora.jpeg
The Museum of Russian Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-strip-regional-heritage-center.jpeg
Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Museum of Russian Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Museum of Russian Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center in 2026.

Incident History — The Museum of Russian Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Museum of Russian Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tmora.jpeg
The Museum of Russian Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-strip-regional-heritage-center.jpeg
Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Museum of Russian Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Museum of Russian Art company.

In the current year, Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company and The Museum of Russian Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company nor The Museum of Russian Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art company nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art company nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Museum of Russian Art company employs more people globally than Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Museum of Russian Art nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References