Comparison Overview

TLF Graphics

VS

Bordeaux Digital PrintInk

TLF Graphics

235 Metro Park, Rochester, 14623, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

TLF Graphics, located in Rochester, New York, established and incorporated in 1980, has built a solid reputation for high quality Pressure Sensitive labels, Labeling Systems, and Screen Printed products. We print on films, foils, and papers, adhesive and non-adhesive materials using flexography, screen, and digital printing processes. TLF Graphics also installs and services automatic and semi-automatic labeling and imprinting systems. Our specialty is product decoration and informational labels that are vital for delivering your message. Our labels are specially designed to ensure their survival through a number of rough environments, from water and oil to extreme temperature. Whatever the product, we have the label! Thermal transfer, print and apply, decals, digital, small or large quantities, variable imaged labels, bar codes, database integration, outdoor labels, vinyl, heat and oil resistant, 8-color capabilities, die-cuts, and more. If you need it, we can print it - any size, any quantity. Our wide range of equipment lets us take on any job. Get in touch with us today about your printing and labeling needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bordeaux Digital PrintInk

Bordeaux Digital PrintInk Ltd, Yavne, undefined, 81227, IL
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Bordeaux Digital Printink is a leading developer and manufacturer of high quality original ink and coating solutions for the wide format digital printing market. Sold in over 100 countries worldwide, Bordeaux offers a full range of Eco solvent, UV & UV LED, Latex, Dye Sublimation, textile and specialty inks, coatings, laminates and bulk delivery systems. Bordeaux inks are developed for and are completely compatible with Roland®, Mimaki®, Mutoh®, HP®, Efi® Vutek®, Seiko®, Epson®, Agfa®, Gandi®, Dilli®, Canon® Océ®, and other printers and with Epson®, Xaar®, Spectra®, Seiko SPT™, Konica Minolta®, Toshiba® printheads. Write to us at [email protected] to connect with a local authorized distributor who will provide you with an efficient, high-margin, printer compatible ink solution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tlf-graphics.jpeg
TLF Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bordeaux-inc-.jpeg
Bordeaux Digital PrintInk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TLF Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bordeaux Digital PrintInk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TLF Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bordeaux Digital PrintInk in 2025.

Incident History — TLF Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TLF Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bordeaux Digital PrintInk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bordeaux Digital PrintInk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tlf-graphics.jpeg
TLF Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bordeaux-inc-.jpeg
Bordeaux Digital PrintInk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TLF Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TLF Graphics company.

In the current year, Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company and TLF Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company nor TLF Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company nor TLF Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company nor TLF Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TLF Graphics company nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TLF Graphics nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither TLF Graphics company nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

TLF Graphics company employs more people globally than Bordeaux Digital PrintInk company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither TLF Graphics nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TLF Graphics nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TLF Graphics nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TLF Graphics nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TLF Graphics nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TLF Graphics nor Bordeaux Digital PrintInk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N