Comparison Overview

TKO

VS

TikTok

TKO

None
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 800 and 849

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: TKO) is a premium sports and entertainment company. TKO owns iconic properties including UFC, the world’s premier mixed martial arts organization; WWE, the global leader in sports entertainment; and PBR, the world’s premier bull riding organization. Together, these properties reach 1 billion households across 210 countries and territories and organize more than 500 live events year-round, attracting more than three million fans. TKO also services and partners with major sports rights holders through IMG, an industry-leading global sports marketing agency; and On Location, a global leader in premium experiential hospitality.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 11,519
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TikTok

Los Angeles, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

TikTok is a discovery tool made just for you. TikTok is a global platform for discovery, joy and endless possibilities — connecting and entertaining more than a billion people across more than 150 countries. TikTok's headquarters are in Los Angeles and Singapore, with additional offices in Austin, Dublin, Paris, Berlin, Dubai, Jakarta, Johannesburg, London, New York, Mexico City, Sao Paolo, San Jose, Seoul, Seattle, and Tokyo.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 74,662
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tkogroup.jpeg
TKO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiktok.jpeg
TikTok
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TKO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TikTok
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TKO in 2025.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

TikTok has 412.82% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — TKO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TKO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TikTok (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TikTok cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tkogroup.jpeg
TKO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tiktok.jpeg
TikTok
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized access, possibly through internal systems or third-party database
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: National Security Risks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Legal Compliance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TKO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TikTok company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TikTok company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas TKO company has not reported any.

In the current year, TikTok company has reported more cyber incidents than TKO company.

Neither TikTok company nor TKO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TikTok company has disclosed at least one data breach, while TKO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TikTok company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while TKO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TikTok company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while TKO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TKO nor TikTok holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TikTok company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TKO company.

TikTok company employs more people globally than TKO company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither TKO nor TikTok holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TKO nor TikTok holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TKO nor TikTok holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TKO nor TikTok holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TKO nor TikTok holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TKO nor TikTok holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X