Comparison Overview

The TJX Companies, Inc.

VS

SEPHORA

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, MA, 01701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

TJX is the leading off-price apparel and home fashions retailer in the U.S. and worldwide, with four global home offices, seven brands, nearly 4,700 stores in nine countries, and five distinctive branded e-commerce sites. As Associates, we make a difference with our contributions—collaborating in delighting shoppers with hidden treasures.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 49,448
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SEPHORA

Neuilly sur Seine, Ile de France, FR, 92576
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Sephora is the world’s leading global prestige beauty retail brand. With over 56 000 talents across 35 markets, Sephora connects customers and beauty brands within the world’s most trusted and dynamic beauty community. We serve a highly engaged community of hundreds of millions of beauty followers across our global omnichannel network of more than 3 000 stores and iconic flagships, and our e-commerce and digital platforms, offering personalized and immersive seamless experiences across every touchpoint. With our curation of close to 500 brands and our own label, Sephora Collection, we offer the most unique and diverse range of prestige beauty products, tailored to our customers’ needs from fragrance to make-up, haircare, skincare and beyond, as we constantly reimagine the world of prestige beauty. Since our inception in 1969 in Limoges, France, and as part of the LVMH Group since 1997, we have been disrupting the prestige beauty retail industry. Today, we continue to break with convention to drive our mission: champion a world of inspiration and inclusion where everyone can celebrate their beauty.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 42,667
Subsidiaries: 101
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tjx.jpeg
The TJX Companies, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sephora.jpeg
SEPHORA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The TJX Companies, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SEPHORA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The TJX Companies, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEPHORA in 2025.

Incident History — The TJX Companies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The TJX Companies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SEPHORA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEPHORA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tjx.jpeg
The TJX Companies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sephora.jpeg
SEPHORA
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: National Security, Social Stability, Data Sovereignty, Economic Protection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The TJX Companies, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SEPHORA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SEPHORA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The TJX Companies, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, SEPHORA company has reported more cyber incidents than The TJX Companies, Inc. company.

Neither SEPHORA company nor The TJX Companies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SEPHORA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while The TJX Companies, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SEPHORA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while The TJX Companies, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. company nor SEPHORA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. nor SEPHORA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SEPHORA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The TJX Companies, Inc. company.

The TJX Companies, Inc. company employs more people globally than SEPHORA company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. nor SEPHORA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. nor SEPHORA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. nor SEPHORA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. nor SEPHORA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. nor SEPHORA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The TJX Companies, Inc. nor SEPHORA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H