Comparison Overview

Tinina Q. Cade Foundation

VS

GoRaise

Tinina Q. Cade Foundation

None
Last Update: 2025-12-21

The Tinina Q. Cade Foundation (TQCF) is a nonprofit organization that serves the needs of families battling infertility. Through education and outreach, we support families struggling with infertility, and strive to educate outside communities about relevant and related issues. In addition, the TQCF also provides financial assistance to families pursuing infertility treatment or domestic adoption through the Tinina Q. Cade Foundation Family Building Grant. This dual approach distinguishes the foundation as the only organization of its kind in the nation.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GoRaise

5 Carliol Square, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 6UF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

GoRaise is a customer loyalty platform, the reward being a donation to the customers chosen good cause. The good cause can be a anything from a national charity to a local PTA, sports club, girl guiding unit etc. Via the affiliate channels, over £750m in donations are available every year from partner retailers. So far only a fraction of this lands in the accounts of the thousands of amazing causes in the UK. GoRaise is on a mission to generate at least £10m in donations by the end of 2017.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tinina-q--cade-foundation.jpeg
Tinina Q. Cade Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goraise.jpeg
GoRaise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tinina Q. Cade Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GoRaise
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tinina Q. Cade Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GoRaise in 2025.

Incident History — Tinina Q. Cade Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tinina Q. Cade Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GoRaise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GoRaise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tinina-q--cade-foundation.jpeg
Tinina Q. Cade Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goraise.jpeg
GoRaise
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company and GoRaise company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, GoRaise company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company.

In the current year, GoRaise company and Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GoRaise company nor Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GoRaise company nor Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GoRaise company nor Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company nor GoRaise company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation nor GoRaise holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company nor GoRaise company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tinina Q. Cade Foundation company employs more people globally than GoRaise company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation nor GoRaise holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation nor GoRaise holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation nor GoRaise holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation nor GoRaise holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation nor GoRaise holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tinina Q. Cade Foundation nor GoRaise holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N