Comparison Overview

Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers

VS

Metis Notarissen

Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers

76 Light Square, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Tindall Gask Bentley is a leading law firm in South Australia, Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Queensland. We've been helping people for more than 50 years with: personal injury, family and divorce law, wills and estates, criminal and disciplinary, commercial and business law, employment law, and property law and conveyancing. TGB Lawyers is the largest personal injury firm in SA and also is the state's largest family and divorce firm, with significant experience and teams across the states and territories in which it operates.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Metis Notarissen

Afrikalaan 2, Maastricht-Airport, 6199 AH, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Uw partner in zekerheid zijn, dát is onze drijfveer. Van het uitbrengen van een gedegen advies tot het volledig ontzorgen. Juridische vraagstukken van een jong volwassene, een gezin, (jonge) ondernemer of een (jonge) senior, bij Metis Notarissen hebben we voor ieder rechtsgebied een specialist in huis, die alle ins en outs van het vakgebied kent en u met raad en daad bijstaat. In begrijpelijke taal, van mens tot mens. Uw sparringpartner die er voor u is op de momenten dat dit gewenst is, zowel in voor- als in tegenspoed. De experts van Metis Notarissen garanderen u daarbij één ding; samen zijn we onderdeel van de oplossing. Dát is zeker weten.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tindall-gask-bentley-lawyers.jpeg
Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metis-notarissen.jpeg
Metis Notarissen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metis Notarissen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metis Notarissen in 2025.

Incident History — Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metis Notarissen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metis Notarissen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tindall-gask-bentley-lawyers.jpeg
Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metis-notarissen.jpeg
Metis Notarissen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company and Metis Notarissen company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Metis Notarissen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company.

In the current year, Metis Notarissen company and Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metis Notarissen company nor Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Metis Notarissen company nor Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Metis Notarissen company nor Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company nor Metis Notarissen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers nor Metis Notarissen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company nor Metis Notarissen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers company employs more people globally than Metis Notarissen company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers nor Metis Notarissen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers nor Metis Notarissen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers nor Metis Notarissen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers nor Metis Notarissen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers nor Metis Notarissen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tindall Gask Bentley Lawyers nor Metis Notarissen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X