Comparison Overview

Times Internet

VS

Arrow Electronics

Times Internet

391, Udyog Vihar Phase III, Gurgaon , Haryana, IN, 122002
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

At Times Internet, we create premium digital products that simplify and enhance the lives of millions. As India’s largest digital products company, we have a significant presence across a wide range of categories, including News, Sports, Fintech, and Enterprise solutions. Our portfolio features market-leading and iconic brands such as TOI, ET, NBT, Cricbuzz, Times Prime, Times Card, Indiatimes, Whatshot, Abound, Willow TV, Techgig and Times Mobile among many more. Each of these products is crafted to enrich your experiences and bring you closer to your interests and aspirations. As an equal opportunity employer, Times Internet strongly promotes inclusivity and diversity. We are proud to have achieved overall gender pay parity in 2018, verified by an independent audit conducted by Aon Hewitt. We are driven by the excitement of new possibilities and are committed to bringing innovative products, ideas, and technologies to help people make the most of every day. Join us and take us to the next level!

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13,276
Subsidiaries: 44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arrow Electronics

9201 East Dry Creek Road, Centennial, Colorado, US, 80112
Last Update: 2025-11-22

Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) guides innovation forward for thousands of leading technology manufacturers and service providers. With 2024 sales of $27.9 billion, Arrow develops technology solutions that help improve business and daily life. Our broad portfolio that spans the entire technology landscape, helps customers design, distribute and deploy forward-thinking products that make the benefits of technology accessible to as many people as possible. Learn more at arrow.com. Are you thinking Five Years Out? Join us at careers.arrow.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19,812
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/timesinternet.jpeg
Times Internet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Times Internet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arrow Electronics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Times Internet in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrow Electronics in 2025.

Incident History — Times Internet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Times Internet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arrow Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrow Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/timesinternet.jpeg
Times Internet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2010
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Times Internet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arrow Electronics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Arrow Electronics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Times Internet company has not reported any.

In the current year, Arrow Electronics company and Times Internet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arrow Electronics company nor Times Internet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Arrow Electronics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Times Internet company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Arrow Electronics company nor Times Internet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Times Internet company nor Arrow Electronics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Times Internet nor Arrow Electronics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arrow Electronics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Times Internet company.

Arrow Electronics company employs more people globally than Times Internet company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Times Internet nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Times Internet nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Times Internet nor Arrow Electronics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Times Internet nor Arrow Electronics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Times Internet nor Arrow Electronics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Times Internet nor Arrow Electronics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H