Comparison Overview

TIME

VS

Femina Group

TIME

undefined, New York, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

TIME is a global media brand built on 100 years of unparalleled trust and authority, with an audience of more than 100 million people worldwide across our platforms. Our team is collaborative, innovative and committed to TIME’s mission of informing, guiding and engaging our audience with groundbreaking journalism, immersive experiences and live events.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2,146
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Femina Group

Jl. HR Rasuna Said Kav B 32-33, Jakarta, 12910, ID
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

We came into existence in 1972 with the launch of Femina, the first women’s magazine in Indonesia. Ever since then, we have grown to become a trusted media group as the contents are on a par with the Indonesian values. We continuously thrive to provide various brands and products that are very well received by Indonesians. With 14 magazines, as well as other divisions like creative boutique, event organizer, radio station, publishing house and online publications, we move beyond the limits. Utilizing a wide variety of modern platform such as the Internet, brand activation and the communities, enables us to optimize the potentials of all divisions and create a collaboration in any form. From the most trusted magazine brands in Indonesia we have succeeded to create the most engaging content and marketing offering in Indonesia, with worldwide recognition. The word ‘impossible’ does not exist in our vocabulary. Every opportunity is a step to progress, and every challenge is the chance to innovate. Please visit http://www.feminagroup.com/career for your career opportunity with us.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 404
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/time.jpeg
TIME
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/femina-group.jpeg
Femina Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TIME
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Femina Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TIME in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Femina Group in 2025.

Incident History — TIME (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TIME cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Femina Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Femina Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/time.jpeg
TIME
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/femina-group.jpeg
Femina Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Femina Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TIME company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Femina Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TIME company.

In the current year, Femina Group company and TIME company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Femina Group company nor TIME company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Femina Group company nor TIME company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Femina Group company nor TIME company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TIME company nor Femina Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TIME nor Femina Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TIME company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Femina Group company.

TIME company employs more people globally than Femina Group company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither TIME nor Femina Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TIME nor Femina Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TIME nor Femina Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TIME nor Femina Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TIME nor Femina Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TIME nor Femina Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.