Comparison Overview

Timberland Regional Library District

VS

San Mateo County Libraries

Timberland Regional Library District

415 Tumwater Blvd SW, None, Olympia, Washington, US, 98501-5799
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The Timberland Regional Library (TRL) serves 29 locations in five southwest Washington State counties, covering nearly 7,000 square miles. TRL plays a leading role in helping people navigate a changing world: assisting them in finding educational and professional tools, learning, ideas, inspiration and support so they can achieve their goals.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

San Mateo County Libraries

125 Lessingia Court, San Mateo, CA, 94402, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

San Mateo County Libraries is a Joint Powers Authority that comprises the cities of Atherton, Belmont, Brisbane, East Palo Alto, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Millbrae, Pacifica, Portola Valley, San Carlos, Woodside, and the unincorporated areas of San Mateo County. We ignite growth through transformative experiences. It’s our mission to strengthen our community by creating an inclusive sense of place and environment for learning. San Mateo County Libraries are incomparable destinations for exploration. Each of our twelve libraries is part of a larger family offering welcoming spaces with friendly faces and worlds of discovery and technological opportunities. We’re here to serve our communities through every chapter of their lives. Visit smcl.org for information about our community libraries and their services. Interested in working for the San Mateo County Libraries? View all job openings here: http://smcl.org/library-jobs/ Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, & Instagram: @SMCLibraries

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 202
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/timberland-regional-library.jpeg
Timberland Regional Library District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-mateo-county-library.jpeg
San Mateo County Libraries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Timberland Regional Library District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
San Mateo County Libraries
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Timberland Regional Library District in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Mateo County Libraries in 2025.

Incident History — Timberland Regional Library District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Timberland Regional Library District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — San Mateo County Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Mateo County Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/timberland-regional-library.jpeg
Timberland Regional Library District
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-mateo-county-library.jpeg
San Mateo County Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Mateo County Libraries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Timberland Regional Library District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Timberland Regional Library District company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas San Mateo County Libraries company has not reported any.

In the current year, San Mateo County Libraries company and Timberland Regional Library District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries company nor Timberland Regional Library District company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Timberland Regional Library District company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other San Mateo County Libraries company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Timberland Regional Library District company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while San Mateo County Libraries company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District company nor San Mateo County Libraries company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District nor San Mateo County Libraries holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District company nor San Mateo County Libraries company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Mateo County Libraries company employs more people globally than Timberland Regional Library District company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District nor San Mateo County Libraries holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District nor San Mateo County Libraries holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District nor San Mateo County Libraries holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District nor San Mateo County Libraries holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District nor San Mateo County Libraries holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Timberland Regional Library District nor San Mateo County Libraries holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H