Comparison Overview

Fortune Gaming

VS

Thunder Valley Casino Resort

Fortune Gaming

3650 E Valley Rd, Renton, Washington, 98057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TIL Gaming is a small casino management company. We utilize functional insights gained over years of direct casino operations experience at the highest executive levels. Our team of specialists includes management operations, finance, marketing, human resources, and other disciplines. TIL Gaming has a proven record of success influencing all critical areas of casino operations: Table Games Operations Food & Beverage Marketing, Sales & Advertising Finance & Accounting Human Resources Security & Surveillance Facilities and IT

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thunder Valley Casino Resort

1200 Athens Avenue, Lincoln, 95648, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Thunder Valley Casino Resort is a AAA Four Diamond award-winning casino and resort in Lincoln, California, 30 miles (48 km) east of Sacramento. It is owned by the United Auburn Indian Community and opened in June 2003. Thunder Valley was the first full Las Vegas-style casino in Northern California. The 275,000-square-foot (25,550 m²) facility offers a variety of gaming including more than 3,000 slot machines and video machines, 100 table games (including blackjack, paigow, etc.), an expansive Bingo Room, and live poker for up to 450 players. The casino regularly holds promotions and special events including drawings, cash prizes, and tournaments. The property features a gift shop along with 19 bars and restaurants for every taste. The expansion completed in July 2010 includes a 17-story, luxury hotel with 297 rooms including 40 well-appointed suites. The hotel also offers meeting rooms, a state-of-the art fitness center, and the luxurious Coconut Pool + Bar with private cabana and lounger rentals in season. Scheduled to open in early 2023, The Venue at Thunder Valley is a sophisticated 4,500-seat, cutting-edge entertainment venue hosting the hottest musical acts, comedic performances, and sporting events along with space for events, conferences and banquets.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 947
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thunder-valley-casino.jpeg
Thunder Valley Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fortune Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thunder Valley Casino Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortune Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thunder Valley Casino Resort in 2025.

Incident History — Fortune Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortune Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thunder Valley Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thunder Valley Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thunder-valley-casino.jpeg
Thunder Valley Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thunder Valley Casino Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fortune Gaming company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thunder Valley Casino Resort company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fortune Gaming company.

In the current year, Thunder Valley Casino Resort company and Fortune Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thunder Valley Casino Resort company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thunder Valley Casino Resort company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thunder Valley Casino Resort company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thunder Valley Casino Resort company employs more people globally than Fortune Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor Thunder Valley Casino Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H