Comparison Overview

Fortune Gaming

VS

NOVOMATIC Americas

Fortune Gaming

3650 E Valley Rd, Renton, Washington, 98057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TIL Gaming is a small casino management company. We utilize functional insights gained over years of direct casino operations experience at the highest executive levels. Our team of specialists includes management operations, finance, marketing, human resources, and other disciplines. TIL Gaming has a proven record of success influencing all critical areas of casino operations: Table Games Operations Food & Beverage Marketing, Sales & Advertising Finance & Accounting Human Resources Security & Surveillance Facilities and IT

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NOVOMATIC Americas

1050 E Business Center Dr, Mount Prospect, Illinois, 60056, US
Last Update:

NOVOMATIC Americas is part of the NOVOMATIC Group of Companies. The NOVOMATIC Group is one of the biggest global producers and operators of gaming technologies, with revenues of about $5B, more than 22,000 employees, and with activities in 50 countries. Headquartered outside of Chicago, IL and founded in 2012, NOVOMATIC Americas continues to bring dynamic gaming products to the North American market. Leveraging the global design, market research and customer performance data of its Austrian parent company, NOVOMATIC Americas has spent the past five years creating market-specific gaming products for the North American and Caribbean jurisdictions.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novomaticamericas.jpeg
NOVOMATIC Americas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fortune Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NOVOMATIC Americas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortune Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NOVOMATIC Americas in 2025.

Incident History — Fortune Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortune Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NOVOMATIC Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NOVOMATIC Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/til-gaming.jpeg
Fortune Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/novomaticamericas.jpeg
NOVOMATIC Americas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fortune Gaming company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NOVOMATIC Americas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NOVOMATIC Americas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fortune Gaming company.

In the current year, NOVOMATIC Americas company and Fortune Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NOVOMATIC Americas company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NOVOMATIC Americas company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NOVOMATIC Americas company nor Fortune Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming company nor NOVOMATIC Americas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor NOVOMATIC Americas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NOVOMATIC Americas company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fortune Gaming company.

NOVOMATIC Americas company employs more people globally than Fortune Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor NOVOMATIC Americas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor NOVOMATIC Americas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor NOVOMATIC Americas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor NOVOMATIC Americas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor NOVOMATIC Americas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fortune Gaming nor NOVOMATIC Americas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H