Comparison Overview

Tietoevry

VS

Infosys

Tietoevry

Helsinki, Finland, FI, FI-02101
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

In a rapidly changing world, technology is everything. It's in the fabric of society. In every part of every business. At the very heart of human evolution. It’s a great power that comes with great responsibility. At Tietoevry, we believe it’s time to shift perspective. It’s not about what technology can do anymore — but what it should. So that the futures of businesses, societies, and humanity can live and thrive. Side by side. This is why we're making it our business to create purposeful technology that reinvents the world for good. https://www.tietoevry.com/en/ #purposefultechnology #Tietoevry

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,254
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Infosys

Infosys Limited, None, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560100
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Infosys is a global leader in next-generation digital services and consulting. We enable clients in more than 50 countries to navigate their digital transformation. With over three decades of experience in managing the systems and workings of global enterprises, we expertly steer our clients through their digital journey. We do it by enabling the enterprise with an AI-powered core that helps prioritize the execution of change. We also empower the business with agile digital at scale to deliver unprecedented levels of performance and customer delight. Our always-on learning agenda drives their continuous improvement through building and transferring digital skills, expertise, and ideas from our innovation ecosystem. Visit www.infosys.com to see how Infosys (NYSE: INFY) can help your enterprise navigate your next.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 352,623
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tietoevry.jpeg
Tietoevry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys.jpeg
Infosys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Tietoevry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infosys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tietoevry in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Infosys has 85.19% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Tietoevry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tietoevry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infosys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tietoevry.jpeg
Tietoevry
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys.jpeg
Infosys
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tietoevry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Infosys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Infosys company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Tietoevry company.

In the current year, Infosys company has reported more cyber incidents than Tietoevry company.

Tietoevry company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Infosys company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Infosys company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Tietoevry company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Infosys company nor Tietoevry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Tietoevry company nor Infosys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Tietoevry nor Infosys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Infosys company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tietoevry company.

Infosys company employs more people globally than Tietoevry company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Tietoevry nor Infosys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Tietoevry nor Infosys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Tietoevry nor Infosys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Tietoevry nor Infosys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Tietoevry nor Infosys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Tietoevry nor Infosys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H